神学年刊
作者:若干作者
第二十四卷 (2003年)
由形下走向形上的思想追索谈庄子的道 网上圣经:实况与前瞻 New Age and Christian Faith Bultmann's Demythologization and Lonergan's Method
第二十四卷 (2003年) 由形下走向形上的思想追索谈庄子的道
作者:周景勋

1. 导 言

形上本体论究竟研究什么?从西方哲学的研究及发展,我们可以肯定的是:由亚里斯多德到圣多玛斯及士林哲学都认为,形上学所探究的是宇宙万物的根本存在理由,即由存在的事物(果)追搜其存在的根由(因),而找出了形上本体论的研究对象:「有」(being),「有」是万物的本根,也是万物的最基本的观念,最普遍而非常单纯的观念,此「有」本身也是「在」,就是存在的有,我们亦可称之为「存有」,存有并非虚无,都有其本质,本质乃存有可被理解和找到的存在的充足理由。可见,形上学最根本的理念有三:就是「存在」、「本质」和「存有」,此理念也是形上学的三种实现,李震教授更强调「存有」(to on, esse, being)是形上学最根本、最原初、最核心的问题;也肯定地说:「形上学(Metaphysics)之名称虽出于一偶然事件,但其背景也指出一个很有意义的看法,因为在『物理学之后的书卷』一说法,很清楚地指出:物理学或自然哲学探讨的对象是形而下的,受时空限制的物质世界及自然世界,而在物理学之后探讨的对象,当然就是物质、自然世界之外之上的形上世界了。依实在论的方法及精神,由形下世界走向形上世界的研究途径,是极为自然、合理而又正确的路子。」1

  于是,形上学在西方哲学中注重研究一个物体是怎么存在的?即「存有」有其「本质之性」及「存在之理」。本质之性是一个物体之所以是这个物体而不是其他物体的分辨;存在之理是说明物体存在的理据,「存在」是实际的,「理」却是抽象的,两者如何配合而为存有呢?亚里斯多德和圣多玛斯从清楚地提出了:或是「自有」,或是「从他而有」的思想;「自有」者常是绝对的存有,其「本质之性」与「存在之理」是同一的,为一完全的「存有」;「从他而有」者是从另一「存有」而得以存在,追根至始源乃从「自有」者而成就其「有」。因此,「存有」在其形上本体的特征而言有其独一无二的实际存在故为「一」,有其本体存在的「真」,例如这个人,人的本体是这个人的基本,必定要有人之所以是人该有的一切,使之实在的存有,这就是真;每一个实在的存有因有了本体所该有的一切,便成为一个完整的本体,毫没缺憾而是完全的,在本体上这便是「善」;一个完全的本体在其内必然有调协和有次序的,这便是存有本身的充实而为「美」。2

1.2 从「物理学之后」的发现

  从「物理学之后」发现了形上本体的思域,这是人在生存中,面对具体事物的自觉意识的反思成果,即人在面对「自然、社会、人性」时作出的生命探源的内在要求,而且有目的性的思想反省,我们可称之为人的意识的自觉活动,这使人明白到:人生活在一个现实世界中,不应只是像动物性机械般的顺应和利用自然而生存,人应该有更高尚的思想追寻:「源头活水」和「终极关怀」的智慧,使生命有方向的发展,这一点大概就是超越现实世界的本体论的根据。故此,人必须提高自己的生存能力,自觉反思,不单只为自己开创一个有秩序的、安适的、自由的生活环境,也当关心自己生活的超越、心灵的归宿、思想的源头,这个方向,西方的哲学与神学的思路进展是由物质走向精神、由现实走向超越、由形下世界走向形上世界的研究途径。牟宗三教授在谈中国文化大动脉中关心的问题时,提出了:「现实关心」和「终极关心」,且用了「事」乃现实性的问题,表现民族集体生活的具体业绩;「理」为终极性的问题,是民族集体生活中的动力之原;「理」是「事」的超越根据,「事」是「理」的客观实现,而「动原」的反思正是「文化寻根」的根据。3

  罗光教授则从生命哲学的探讨中追索生命的归依历程,即由生命具体的「在」出发,认识动作、伦理道德、美和美感、社会国家,提出了生命的主体--我,即生命的发展,到生命的旋律,最后是生命的超越,与创造者--神的契合为形上生命哲学的终极思路。4 罗光教授融会了中西哲学与神学的思想,为后学者揭开了「源头活水」的思想探索。

1.3 由形下走向形上的途径

  李震教授毕身的钻研都很重视「形上学」,他的思路乃:「由形下世界走向形上世界的研究途径」,他很清晰地说:

实际上,中国哲学思想的发展和走向也是如此。在中国的哲学传统中,没有「形上学」一辞,但是不能说没有形上学的概念。在过去,多用「宇宙论、宇宙起源论、玄学、道学」等名称指称探讨形上学问题的学问,一般说来,大多跟道家的学派有关。然而儒家先秦时代的集体作品《系辞传》是最有形上学内涵及精神的作品,而且其中许多话并非出自孔子之口,但大多学者肯定,《系辞传》对《周易》的诠释,是以孔子的思想为主轴和基调的。《系辞传》有:「是故形而上者谓之道,形而下者谓之器。化而裁之谓之变,推而行之谓之通;举而错之天下之民,谓之事业。」(系辞上传第十二章)前二句的大意是:在理论及实际生活的领域中,有一个形而上的世界,它探讨的对象是「道」,与之相对的还有一个形而下的世界,即充满了有形有状的,有变数的形器世界。中间二句的大意是:形质世界的千变万化,经由「道」这唯一的,绝对无待原理的制裁,其多元性不但可以理解,而且可以各顺其性,各适其所。由此可见,天下之大道、至道,若能推行开来,运行无阻的时候,必能开物成务,这就叫作「通」,换言之,「道」即融通万象、万物、万事、万有的大道理与大实现。后二句乃补充前义,指若能将上述道理落实为措施与行动,获得天下万民的肯定与支持,社会势必在安和乐利中发展,迈向繁荣,成就事业。

中国人即使在探讨形上世界的问题时,亦时时不忘将那些极深奥的理念或大道理落实到日常的实践生活中去。这也正是中国传统文化、宗教与哲学思想的,一个非常珍贵的特质!5

虽说由「形下」走向「形上」的探究,似是以「形上」之道作为终极就可以不说了,实际上不是截然而论的,而是要确定「形上」与「形上」的思域是互相贯通的,所以「形上」之道的理念是可以落实到「形下」世界:人的日常实践生活中的;方东美教授说:

在中国,要成立任何哲学思想体系,总要把形而上、形而下贯穿起来,衔接起来,将超越形上学再点化为内在形上学,儒家中人不管道德上成就多高,还必须「践形」,把价值理想在现实世界、现实人生中完全实现。道家固然非常超越,但是到最高境界时,又以道为出发地,向下流注:「道生一、一生二、二生三、三生万物。」道家理想亦须贯注到现实人生中。6

  由是,我们可以看出:哲学的智慧总是根据过去,启发未来,而对未来的一切理想又能根据现在的生命、行动去创造,就是要贯串过去,透视现在,玄想未来;即在现实中发挥生命精神,以现在为出发点,凝视未来,实践理想、落实行动,眼光放在人类的未来,为未来制造一个完美的蓝图,这便是司马迁所说的:「究天人之际,通古今之变。」7

1.4 中国形上学的三个向度

形上学的内涵所研究不外乎:本体论(Ontology)、宇宙论(Cosmology)、人性论(人类学Anthropology);这在中国哲学中所研究的就是《易经》中所提的:「天、地、人」的学问。邬昆如教授认为:「整理中国形上学的课题,在中国古代经典中,天地人三才相互间有许多重叠的地方,这种思想的模式,事实上是重综合、重圆融、重整体的思想进路。」8 从《易经》圆融整体贯通的思路,开拓了儒道的思想;9 于是,邬教授从《易经》的思路,以历史纵的发展,形上学的内涵,整理中国哲学的形上学的三个向度:10

1.4.1 「物理之后」的形上学思维:

  这个思路是透过对感官世界现象的观察,审视感官世界背后的真象,重点在奠立「本体论」。「古者包牺氏之王天下也,仰则观象于天,俯则观法于地;观鸟兽之文,与地之宜;近取诸身,远取诸物;于是始作八卦。」(系辞下传第二章)伏牺由观察所得的功能乃是:「以通神明之德,以类万物之情。」

1.4.2 「伦理之后」的形上思维:

  中国哲学一直以儒家为主流,伦理道德始终是思想的核心。「伦理之后」的形上学,重点在奠立「伦理学」,以找到伦理规范的最终基础为目标;伦理规范也就是道德规范,规范人在道德行为后的心安或不安的良知情操;故此,儒家除了提出各种德目,劝人行善避恶之外,就是指出「为何道德」的哲学问题,以「德」配「天」的肯定,就是以「天」的概念作为核心的形上内容,人性的根源便也归诸于天,「天」的无私便落实到人生的伦理道德上。

1.4.3 「符号之后」的形上学11

  道家的形上概念是本体的「道」,「道」是「不可道」的,只能以隐喻或寓言表达出来;故道家努力设法透视《易经》符号系统以前的真象,深入事物的本质,尤其是事物的原因、原理、基础;于是,道家对宇宙万物的默观,认定「道」的本质不可知,即道体不可知,只有道因可观察;道因所呈现的,毕竟是道的外显,是道以万物的原理,呈现在现象界。故此人观察现象,就能推论本体的性质,「道」便成了超越的,无所不在的,内存于万物的;但因「道」的「不可道」,只能透过「隐喻」或「寓言」来理解,其形上学就成为「符号之后」的性格。

  我们从三个向度分析中国形上思想,其特色不在于形上形下的截然划分,而是互相贯通的,若要分说,则在于心内心外之分,心内的道德心,心内的意境。儒家的丰饶心灵,在于道德实践的表现;道家的丰饶心灵,则在于艺术意境的发挥,两者都是人性的内在超越。12

1.5 本文的探讨思路

  从上面当代研究中西形上学的学者的思域中,吾人亦取采:由「形下」到「形上」的思想追索的方法来探讨中国哲学的形上思想,然因中国哲学的形上层面有其实存性、超越性和整体性的特征,故形下与形上可以互相贯通,形下的事物追索形上的本根(源头),形上的思想亦必然地落实而内在于形下的事物中(活水),成为生命的终极目标。本论文以庄子的「道」为例,探讨庄子形上哲学的本体意义,以揭示庄子「生命思想」和「精神超越」归向「道」的历程。



1. 李震著,《面对形上学的一些省思》哲学与文化月刊345,第三十卷第二期,台湾辅仁大学 哲学与文化月刊杂志社出版 2003年2月 20-21页。 
2. 罗光著,《形上生命哲学》,学生书局 2001年9月初版 1-4页。
3. 牟宗三讲演录,《中国文化的省察》,联合报出版,联经总经销1986年4次印行 71, 101页。
4. 罗光着,《形上生命哲学》,学生书局 2001年9月初版 1-4页。
5. 李震著,《面对形上学的一些省思》哲学与文化月刊345,第三十卷第二期,台湾辅仁大学 哲学与文化月刊杂志社出版 2003年2月 21页。
6. 方东美著,「第一章 中国哲学精神--导论」,《原始儒家道家哲学》,黎明文化事业公司 1983年9月 18页。
7. 同上,40页。
8. 邬昆如著,《中国形上学的三个向度》哲学与文化月刊345,第三十卷第二期,台湾辅仁大学 哲学与文化月刊杂志社出版 2003年2月 5页。
9. 高怀民著,《大易哲学论》,成文出版社 1978年6月 9页。高教授认为:中国哲学最重要的二大派:儒、道二家,其思想都渊源于易经。
10. 邬昆如著,《中国形上学的三个向度》哲学与文化月刊345,第三十卷第二期,台湾辅仁大学 哲学与文化月刊杂志社出版 2003年2月 6-14页。
11. 方东美著,「第一章 中国哲学精神--导论」,《原始儒家道家哲学》,黎明文化事业公司 1983年9月 124-130页。方东美教授曾肯定:《易经》可分为「符号系统」以及「文字系统」二大部份。儒家的努力是对文字的解读部份,设法落实到人生的伦理道德;而道家的关怀则是:符号系统之前的原始状态究竟是什么?
12.邬昆如著,《中国形上学的三个向度》哲学与文化月刊345,第三十卷第二期,台湾辅仁大学 哲学与文化月刊杂志社出版 2003年2月 15页。

2. 庄子哲学中生命历程的终极回归

2.1 庄子内篇的生命精神

吾人在阅读和思考庄子书的内容时,发觉庄子书每篇都围绕着一个与生命历程有关的中心内容,如:

逍遥游篇

  谈论生命不当有所欲求,当顺应自然之性;离「小大之辩」,遵道而行,优游自如,不被物欲所诱,免受尘网所困;故真正的逍遥在「无己、无功、无名」,这样,才能归于大通。

齐物论篇

  更以自然之道调和人生命中之是非彼此的分别,使是非不生,物物皆是其所是;由于造成是非彼此乃因人成心妄见狭思,故必去之,从大知以至葆光,在「物化」中忘掉自我,以达「道通为一」境。

养生主篇

言养生当依乎天理,因其固然;以「不伤」为本(抱朴子「极言」中有言:「养生以不伤为本」),诚如庖丁依循之「道」,才能出神入化而不伤。因此,人当「缘督以为经」,守常而不为物役;「安时而处顺」,与道相从,哀乐不能入;如是者,生死泰然,与大化冥合。

人间世篇

要求人不要系缚于大用小用、材与不材之间,当明「无用之用」的超越义;虚心应物,顺任自然必须「养中」「游心」,且安之若命;如此,人在乱世道失的当世才能保真无伤。

德充符篇

强调人要重视精神生命的超越,不为外形之残全所束缚,如「游于形骸之内」、「内保之而外不伤」、「德有所长、而形有所忘」,故能「不以好恶内伤其身」;这样,人便能「常因自然」而体悟生命的妙趣,以死生为一条而通乎大道。

大宗师篇

指出人生命的归宿,给人的生命终向导出一条通达天人一体境界的大道。全篇的核心点在「道」,道是无形、永存及无限性的;人不可须臾离,必须不断「闻道」,继而「学道」以「体道」,「得道」,即同于道。唯有同于道者才能「坐忘」,将生死置于度外,不悦生不恶死,入于不生不死,而「与造物者为人,游乎天地一气」。可见大宗师篇与其他各篇有着密切的相连性,成为庄子哲学的精神之本根和终极。

应帝王篇

主旨在谈「无为无私之治」,更好说是提出「顺物自然而无容私焉」,务使人人能把自性之自然,投向「道」;故不能以有为之治伤己伤人:「日凿一窍,七日浑沌死」;故郭象注曰:「夫无心而任乎自然者,应为帝王也。」只有无心而任自然的帝王才能保存「道」的「无容私」的真面目,使百姓活于自然自如中,与道通一。

除了以上所言的内篇外,外杂篇中亦有很多有关生命的记述,尤其提出不同人物的生命体验或思想精神,来描绘和发挥庄子的生命精神。

由于要描绘生命体验与思想精神,不是单用文字便可以完全表达出来;因此,庄子及其后学者都找出一个特别的文体--「哲理寓言」,以一种轻松的笔法和哲思,刻划出在紊乱不安、黑暗丑恶、错误荒谬的社会事实中,有一股由「道」所散布的「真、善、美、圣」的力量和境地,启导人努力追寻,以突破黑暗,克服错误,把握生命的真己,超越丑恶的威胁,创造美善的终向;也就是使人「有意识地,自觉地通过联想与想像来反映人们自社会实践中,生发出来的思想和认识,经验和智慧」。(13)

当我们阅读庄子书时,我们可以发觉庄子在表露生命体验和精神境界时,都用寓言来描绘,且每篇文章都采用几则寓言加以说明,构成一个完美的整体;所以我们可说:读了庄子的寓言,就等于读了庄子书,也读了庄子的哲学。无怪乎太史公司马迁在史记卷六十三庄子列传中言:「故其着书十余万言,大抵率寓言也。」所谓寓言就是寓「道」之言。

2.2 庄子的寓「道」之言

然而,在庄子寓「道」之言哲学中有着一些表达「思想」的「名」和「字」;这些「思想」都是庄子对「宇宙万物」的生命,以及「个人生命」的生化流衍的体验;还有,从庄子对有限生命的体验所悟得的生命历程之终极:「道」乃是人生命的归根终极。庄子的思想不是杂乱无章的,而是有着一个清晰的思想架构,构成庄子生命哲学的一个归「道」的历程体系。至于「名」和「字」正代表着一些事物的称谓,以表达一些「概念」和「范畴」;然而,中国古代没有「概念」和「范畴」两个名词,这都是西方哲学翻译来的名词,即相当于中国古代着作中的「名」和「字」。如:

孔子提出「正名」:「名不正则言不顺。」(论语.子路)

管子论形名说:「物固有形,形固有名,名当 谓之圣人。」(心术上篇)

庄子说:「名者实之宾也。」(逍遥游)

公孙龙说:「夫名,实谓也。」(名实论)

墨子说:「以名举实。」(小取)

可见,「名」乃一些事物或思想的指谓,以「名」代表某些事物的形式与思想的内容,这就是「概念」;反过来说,有实必待之以「名」,即有了事物或思想内容,等待编列在一个固定的内涵中,这即今日西方所说的「范畴」。

2.3 庄子的思想范畴

我们相信,中国古代的思想家在建立自己的哲学思想时,必然会提出一些基本的思想内容及名词字汇,其内自然会包括一概念和范畴;由这些概念和范畴可以构成思想家哲学思想的一个体系,便成为一家的范畴体系。庄子在他生命的体道历程中,必然有他独特的思想概念和范畴,以构成他的形上思想体系。今试列于下:

「道」:

  「夫道未始有封」、「道通为一」(齐物论);「夫道、有情有信」(大宗师),「精神生于道」(知北游)等等。

「一」:

「道通为一」(齐物论)、「一知之所知」(德充符)、「孰知死生存亡之一体者」(大宗师)、「能抱一乎」(庚桑楚)等等。

「气」:

「游乎天地之一气」(大宗师)、「通天下一气耳」(知北游)等等。

「天、人」:

「知天之所为,知人之所为者,至矣」(大宗师)等等。

「理」:

「依乎天理」(养生主)、「顺之以天理」(天运篇)、「是所以语大义之方,论万物之理也」(秋水篇)等等。

「自然」:

  「常因自然而不益生也」(德充符)、「顺物自然,而无容私焉」(应帝王)、「调之以自然之命」(天运篇)、「莫之为而常自然」(缮性篇)、「自然不可易也」(渔父篇)等等。

「无为」:

「彷徨手无为其侧」(逍遥游)、「逍遥乎无为之业」(大宗师)、「无为为之之谓天」、「无为复朴」(天地篇)、「无为而无不为」(则阳篇)等等。

「朴」:

「雕琢复朴」(应帝王)、「无为复朴」(天地篇)、「吾子使天下无失其朴」(天运篇)、「复归于朴」(山木篇)、「朴素而天下莫能与之争美」(天道篇)等等。

庄子书中许多名词,如「以明」、「道枢」、「物化」、「悬解」、「心斋」、「坐忘」、「游」、「虚」等,没有构成普遍承认的范畴,(14)但这些名词都是庄子生命返归「道」的历程的重要方法和思想概念,我们可以从这些概念和范畴,综合出庄子形上哲学的体系。

2.4 庄子生命哲学中的归「道」历程

在庄子生命回归「道」的体系中,所注意的全在于「道通为一」的超越思想,故有「忘」物我以至「齐」物我,「一」是非,「同」生死,「不分」成毁的思想表达,如庄周梦蝶和妻死鼓盆而歌等寓言,都在展示生命和思想的超越,好使心生命和身生命都不受束缚,与整个自然、整个宇宙,以及万物合而为一,视同一体,故能「未始有物,道通为一」。体验真正生命在「道」中的流衍,即生命一气的流行,而能「安时而处顺,哀乐不能入」(养生主),也能「入水不濡,入火不热」(大宗师)和「御六气之辩以游无穷」,以达到生命圆融终极的「至人,真人,神人」的境界(逍遥游)。

其实,这个回归「道」的体系,也是庄子「生命历程」思想的终极点;所以不论是「游心」工夫,或「游世」工夫都必须复归自然,超越人事;这种因任自然,「乘物以游心,托不得已以养中」(人间世)和「虚己以游世」(山木篇)之举,正是「道」的体现;这与郭象之注庄要先肯定人事,认为人事本身就是自然,实在有出入。(15)因为庄子所关心的不是伦理、政治问题,而是人的身生命和心生命不终身为物奴役,回归自然,而与「道」冥合的问题;就是这个形(身生命)神(心生命)问题终归结于「道」,成为人的理想人格的独立和精神自由,构成了庄子形上哲学的核心和实质。(16)

我们可以从「逍遥游」中那些飘然脱俗的寓言,到提出所谓的「至人无己,神人无功,圣人无名」之极境,表明了庄子所要追求的境界。又在「齐物论」中,庄子最后要建立的是「天地与我并生,万物与我为一」这一个豁大开阔的系统,使我们能看到「大道未始有封」,不会陷入一个封闭的系统里,更好说是为建立「道通为一」的境界;于是,庄子是站在一个无穷阔大的系统里面,采取一个广大的立场,追求一个最高的理想人格,这都是通过对「道」的论证来展开和达成的,故无所不贯,无所不通;这就是庄子哲学的本体论,都是由生命一气的流衍所贯通的,因为「气」使天地万物的生命通为一体:「通天下一气」(知北游)、「游乎天地之一气」(大宗师)。可见,庄子从生命的提升中,要达到的是完全的精神超越,进入逍遥自得,精神无所不住的「无何有之乡,广漠之野」(逍遥游)的境界,不做一切外在世界的奴隶:「物物而不物于物」(山木篇),做一个具有精神自如自适的人,将生命精神提升到「寥天一」(大宗师)处,就是那广阔的「道」境处。这是说,庄子把生命--人看成一个生命哲学的起点,而不是一个终点;人是在生命历程中不断地自我提升,以至归向「道」,与「道」通合为一之境。方东美说:

道家从老子到庄子,都是把人看成一个起点,不是一个终点。所以说:「人法地,地法天,天法道,道法自然」。道家思想是从人出发,但是要把人的极限打破,然后在宇宙的客体里面,找着客体的核心。这个客体的核心就是大道的绝对自由精神。(17)

2.5 庄子的悟「道」

庄子体悟到「道」的无容私,自然无为故能化生万物,覆载万物(天地篇),无为而为之公。因此,人若要归「道」而与「道」冥合同一,必须顺应自然,安之若命,无为游心,泯灭有为之知和有为之欲,即「忘」物我地从吾丧我开始,打破生命极限的束缚,才能跨出「人为」的局限,而顺天任化,而至天人不相胜,天人相和合,即「不必心损道,不以人助天」、「畸于人而侔于天」(大宗师);实在就是「能两忘而化其道」(大宗师);人必须依乎天理,虚而待物,展灵生命的超越不在物我,而在于「无为为之谓天」(大宗师)之自然无为中离形去知,使精神生命进入超然之境;这样,「天」便内在于能「忘物我」的真人的生命中;这时便能体验到:

「形莫若就,心莫若和。」(人间世)

「彼有骸形,而无损心。」(大宗师)

「德有所长,形有所忘。」(德充符)

于是,当下悟得「庸距知吾所谓天之非人乎?所谓人之非天乎?」(大宗师)即「天即人,人即天」也,便能「知天之所为、知人之所为、至矣。」(大宗师)而在真人的心中,一切都汇归于一,因为「有真人而后有真知」(大宗师)。有真知的人必然能「乘天地之正,御六气之辩,以游无穷」(逍遥游),是获得绝对自由自如的人,即能自觉地绝对地顺应支配天地万物的「道」,故能做到「有人之形,故群于人,无人之情,故是非不得于身。眇乎小哉,所以属于人也;謷乎大哉,独成其天」(德充符);既然能与自然同体,必可照之于天,莫若以明,得其环中,以应无穷;当下「忘年忘义,振于无竟,故寓诸无竟」(齐物论),处虚而游。因为「唯道集虚」,所以便能进乎生命一气如流衍中,即能「心斋」地处于生命的超越境。如此,生命之超越乃以其虚、养其和--「和之以天倪」(齐物论),「游心乎德之和」(德充符)--在贯通天人而外,亦可沟通物我,涵容万化,何此是破除形累,还可自作生命的主宰。然后,虚己以游世。(18)在此,我们要明白的一点就是:庄子在生命精神上言知天知人通贯为一,乃在于「气」,即生命一气之流衍,实为虚而待物的自然天理之固然;圣人能涵融此生命之一气,故能「登假于道」,即能「两忘而化其道」(大宗师),与「道」为一。

2.6 小结

由上所言,我们可以肯定地说:庄子的寓言,无不扣紧人生命向「道」作回归的亲切体验,与精神所要登假的理格人格,即成为至人、真人、神人的理想。所以,我们也可肯定:庄子的哲学,在回归「道」的历程上,「乃是由人之如何游心于天地万物之中,与人间生活以悟『道』。故其言道,亦恒取喻于种种常人生活中种种实事,如逍遥游之庖人治庖、宋人为洴澼絖;齐物论之南郭子綦隐机而卧、仰天而嘘;养生主之庖丁解牛;人间世之奉命出使、匠石过树;德充符之与兀者同游;大宗师之问病、吊丧;应帝王之神巫看相,初皆人之生活中事。」(19)可见,在人的日常生活之事中,只要人能用心去体悟,无不感悟「道」之行乎其中;故人当专注在自我生命价值的深切反省里面,以体悟生活中的「道」,好能与之契合,使自我的生命不断地攀登「道」境,实现与「道」通为一的理想人格:「至人、真人、神人」之境;也体悟「道」乃内在人的生命人格中;人只是透过天地万物及人间生活中的「道」,将人心中的「道」由生命一气的流衍显扬出来,与万物相合为一,即可体悟:「天地与我并生,而万物与我为一」(齐物论);此乃「自其同者视之,万物皆一也」之故(德充符)。所以庄子强调「自然」,人要意识到自我的生命与万物的生命都是自然的产物,人必须在自然交互作用的历程中来发展自己,只有达到与自然为一(安时处顺,安之若命),才会感生命的自由自适(顺物自然而无容私<应帝王>)。这种在自然历程中发展自己,可说是生命由「自在」而「自越」、「自发」而「自觉」的生命体道得道的历程。(20)

  
13. 公木著,《先秦寓言概论》,齐愚书社 1984年 42, 46页。
14. 参阅张岱年着,「论中国古代哲学的范畴体系」,《哲学探索集》,中国社会科学出版社 1988 年5月1版 249-251页。
15. 见李泽厚著,「漫述庄禅」,《哲学探索集》,中国社会科学出版社 1988年5月1版 351-353页。
16. 同上,340页。
17. 方东美著,《原始儒家道家哲学》,黎明文化事业公司 1983年9月 281页。
18. 王邦雄著,《庄子哲学的生命精神(下)》,鹅湖月刊31,第三卷第七期,1978年1月15日 8-10页。
19. 唐君毅著,《中国哲学原论(原道篇一)》,学生书局 1984年1月(台四版) 342-343页。
20. 丁祯彦、 宏主编,《中国哲学史教程》,华东师范大学出版社,86页。

3. 庄子哲学的本体思想

中国文字有一种微妙的内涵。我们可以这样说:每一个「字」都是一个符号,代表着一些事物的称谓,或表达一个意义。(21)可见,这个符号所包容的内涵很广泛!但其渊源蕴藏着一门大学问:即每一个「字」都有其来源和根据,有其个别的意)义,也有其深奥的思想;故文字学以「六书」来解释和说明字原时,有四体二用之说:四体者乃指:「象形、指事、会意、形声」也;二用者为:「转注、假借」也。从六书中,我们可以了解所谓文字就是:「记述思想、言语,以明种种事物义理之符号。」(22)

「道」字,在文字学上是代表一个符号;符号乃象征一个行动、一个思想、一个情况、一件事物、或一个概念、一个范畴;在庄子的哲学中,「道」是最基本也是最重要的概念;倘若我们不能理解庄子的「道」,就不能把握庄子的形上哲学,因为「道」是天地万物生命的本根,即天地万物所以生之总原理,亦是宇宙究竟的本根。(23)

3.1 从形上角度探讨庄子书中的「道」

西方哲学的形上学所探讨的问题重点乃「存有」本身的问题,亦即是亚里斯多德所指的第一哲学,讨论万物基本原因的知识。(24)实在地,万物存在的基本原因的探求,必涉及存在的最后根由或终极的问题。这个问题,在中国哲学中也不断地有所探求,只是探求的方法有异于西方理智求知的推理方法,都是以生命的体验,从实际的生活中,透过宇宙万物生命的变化而体悟得来的。尤其是「道家」,从老子开始就清楚地提出宇宙万物生命的本根之「道」的概念。然而,在表达「道」时,始不知如何称之,因为「道可道,非常道」(道德经1)之故,唯有强名之曰「道」:「吾不知其名,字之曰道」(道德经25)。然而这个不知其名的「道」乃是万物生成的本根,其自身是先天地生的:「有物混成,先天地生,寂兮寥兮,独立而不改,周行而不殆,可以为天下母。吾不知其名,字之曰道。」(道德经25)

若就状态说,「道」为「无」,为「有」,即「无」为「道」未生成万物之前的状态;「有」则是「道」生成万物之后的状态,故老子说:「无名天地之始,有名万物之母。」(道德经1)而「无」与「有」的关系是:「天下万物生于有,有生于无。」(道德经40)「道」既是生成万物着,故必定是实存的。

庄子的思想在形上的本体论中,可说是与老子的思想相似,他对「道」的体认是这样的:

「道」不可闻,闻而非也;「道」不可见,见而非也;「道」不可言,言而非也。知形形之不形乎!「道」不当名。(知北游)

于人之论者,论之冥冥,所以论「道」,而非「道」也。(知北游)

既然「道」不可闻,不可见,不可言,却又是生成万物者:「且道者,万物之所由也。庶物失之者死,得之者生。」(渔父篇)「形(物)非道不生。」(天地篇)那么,在万物未生成之前,不可「闻、见、言」的「道」是怎样的呢?从状态上言,庄子认为是:「非物」、「冥冥无形」、「无有」、「无」:

有先天地生者物邪?物物者「非物」。物出不得先物也,犹其有物也;犹其有物也,无已。(知北游)

物而不物,故能物物,明乎物物者之「非物」。(在宥篇)

夫昭昭生于「冥冥」.有伦生于「无形」,精神生于道,形本生于精;而万物以形相生。(知北游)

出无本,入无窍。……有乎生,有乎死,有乎出,有乎入,入出而无见其形,是谓天门;天门者,「无有」也;万物出乎「无有」,有不能以有为有,必出乎「无有」。(庚桑楚)

泰初有「无」,无有无名。一之所起,有一而未形。(天地篇)

「道」的先天地生的状态虽是「非物」,即「无」,却肯定「道」是生化万物的本体,即是「物物者」;而「无有」,「冥冥无形」又是万物生成之原由,然「无有」乃相对于「有」的状态而言,「冥冥无形」亦是相对于「形」的状况而言,犹似道之先于物的状态为「非物」一样,故能为「物物者」,即「道」之先于「有」的状态为「无有」;「道」之先于「昭昭」的状态为「冥冥」;「道」之先于「有伦(形)」的状态为「无形」;「道」之先于「有名」的状态为「无」。故「非物」、「冥冥」、「无形」、「无有」、「无」都是先天地生的「道」的不同情况下的「状态」。然而,不论「道」的状态如何,庄子要肯定的是:「道」是实存的、超越的、整体的。故,庄子所言的「道」与老子所言的「道」是一样的,只是庄子所描绘的「道」的状态较老所描绘的「道」的状态为「无」更广泛和丰富,不但发挥了老子的思想,更创造了自己独特的思想,那就是他特别强调「生命」的超越,与体道得道的生命历程;例如大宗师所记载的一则寓言:「南伯子葵问道于女偊」中,很清楚地说出了:

--从「学道」到「体道得道」的历程天夫:

外天下 → 外物 → 外生 → 朝彻 → 见独 →无古今→ 不生不死

--从「闻道」到「体道得道」的传承天夫:

副墨 → 洛诵 → 瞻明 → 聂许 → 需役 → 于讴 → 玄冥 → 参寥 → 疑始

亦如庄子的另一则寓言:

颜成子游谓东郭子綦曰:自吾闻子之言,一年而野,二年而从,三年而通,四年而物,五年而来,六年而鬼入,七年而天成,八年而不知生不知死,九年而大妙。(寓言篇)

这则寓言实与上一则寓言相应,显示出体道的一段生命历程,也说明了庄子的生命思想乃向「道」回归的历程哲学,以达到与道合一的终极大妙之境。

也因为人人体道的方法和体悟不同,故庄子所描绘的「道」状态也特别广泛和丰富,以显示「道」无私的伟大。今分别以实存性、超越性和整体性来介绍庄子的道。

3.2 道的实存性

齐物论有言:「未始有物」。

实在是指出与「非物」、「冥冥无形」、「无有」、「无」一样的状态;在这状态下,可以说什么都没有,即没有界限、没有分别,所以是「未始有封」的,只是一片浑沌:「杂乎芒芴之间」(至乐篇);「芒芴」相似于老子所言的「恍兮惚兮」(道德经14)的状态,恍惚指「道」(25)。然而,「道」的本体是怎样的呢?大宗师清楚明显地说:

夫道,有情有信,无为无形;可传而不可受,可得而不可见;自本自根,未有天地,自古以固存;神鬼神帝,生天生地;在太极之先而不为高,在六极之下而不为深,先天地生而不为久,长于上古而不为老。

从这一段描述中,我们可以进一步的分析:

3.2.1 「夫道,有情有信,无为无形。」

此乃指出「道」的「真实性」,乃实存的,具体的。「情」就是老子道德经二十一章所言的「精」:「窈兮冥兮,其中有精,其精甚真,其中有信。」(26)而「信」乃验信也。故我们可说「有情」与「无为」相配合,「有信」与「无形」相配合;因为「道」的「真实性」之存在乃:「情」之「实」,即「精」之「真」;人间世篇言:「吾专至乎事之情。」此「情」字乃作「实」解。而「信」之验信亦乃「实」也,如秋水篇就将「信」与「情」连用:「至精无形……是信情乎?」成玄英疏:「信,实也。」所以,我们说:「『有情有信』的『情』字并非感情之情,情若解释为感情,则与下文的『无为』相龃龉。这里的『情』与『信』都是真实之义,说明『道』是真实而不妄的客观实在。」(27)又因为真实存在的「道」是无为的,故也就无目的无作为,也就是自然无心的。又因为真实无妄的「道」是无形的,故超越人的感觉经验,乃「不可受」和「不可见」的「非物」、「无有」;知北游的形容:「道不可闻,闻而非也;道不可见,见而非也。」「道」虽「不可受」却「可传」,「不可见」却「可得」,因为「道」是内在于万物的生命中,人可以从心中领悟之。

3.2.2 「自本自根,未有天地,自古以固存。」

我们可说「道」的实存性在于「道」的「自存性」,即自本自根而固存的,而自本自根有自有的意思,因自有才有「自存性」,也才能作万有之根。于是,这自存性引申出「道」为万物的本根(28),即生化天地万物。故可说:「自本」是言「道」为万物之本;「自根」则言「道」为万物之根。庄子也曾说:「惛然若亡而存,油然不形而神,万物畜而不知,此之谓本根。」(知北游)「本根」是无形无状的存在,是万物生成变化的基础。(29)此本根所指的就是「自本自根」的「道」,肯定「道」的实存性;更肯定「道」为「自有实体」,否则就是被生者,而不是「物物者」(在宥篇)和「生生者」(大宗师),便不能化生万物。(30)

3.2.3 「神鬼神帝,生天生地。」

  道既然是万物的本根,能生化万物,故能「生鬼生帝,生天生地。」因为,「神」有「生」的意义,亦有使成为鬼神的意思。章炳麟在「庄子解故」一书中释说:「『神』与生义同。说文:神,天神引出万物者也。『神鬼』者,引出鬼;『神帝』者,引出帝。」以「引出」说明「道」的功用,实在符合「道」为「本根」--万物生成之根由与原理的传统说法。(31)

张默生亦解释说:「王先谦云:『下文堪坏冯夷等,鬼也;狶韦伏羲等,帝也;其实皆道神也。』神者申也,申者身也,身者也,即有身孕,生之意也。」(32)由此,我们可说:「神鬼神帝」即「生鬼生帝」,与下一句的「生天生地」是对偶句,互相配合。互相配合,乃在于说出「道」是生化天地万物者,乃天地万物(包括鬼与帝)之本根,也就是「物物者」(知北游、在宥篇),「生生者」和「造物者」(大宗师)。故「道」也可以说是万物存在的根据和发展:「况万物之所系,而一化之所待」(大宗师),乃说出道为万物一化之所待所系的大宗师。

3.2.4 「在太极之先而不为高,在六极之下而不为深,先天地生而不为久,长于上古而不为老。」

这四句也是对偶句,在于描述「道」的超时间和空间。「高与深」乃形容「空间」的,即高过太极之上,太极乃指「天」也。(33)又深过六极之下,可包容天地四方之六合,故不为深。这可看出实存的「道」之普遍性存在乃超越「空间」的。「久与老」是形容「时间」的,即久过天地存在的时期,老过上古的时期,明言是指超越时间,故与「自古以固存」是相应的,以说明「道」是永恒的存在,无始终、无衰老、无变化。虽然「道」是超越时空的,却内在于时空、即内在于万物中,不被时空与万物所束缚。(34)

3.3 道的超越性

「道」既然超越时间和空间,那就必定是超越一切事物。所以,「道」的「超越性」乃指其不被万物所束缚,所局限,而是内在于万物中,故李震教授解释:「超越性在于指出道虽然内在于万物,是构成万物的内在成份,例如道在于人,在于树,在于石头;但是任何东西、人、树或石头等,都不能局限道。」(35) 这种内在一切事物又超越一切事物的描绘,庄子在知北游中很清楚,又很微妙、很精彩的说了:

东郭子问「道」于庄子曰:「所谓道,恶乎在?」

庄子曰:「无所不在。」

东郭子曰:「期而后可?」

庄子曰:「在蝼蚁。」

曰:「何其下邪?」

曰:「在稊稗。」

曰:「何其愈下邪?」

曰:「在瓦甓。」

曰:「何其愈甚邪?」

曰:「在屎溺。」

东郭子不应。

庄子曰:「夫子之问也,固不足质。正获之问于监巿履狶也,每下愈况。汝唯莫必,无乎逃物。周-咸三者,异名同实,其指一也」。

由「道」之内在蝼蚁、稊稗、瓦甓、屎溺,却又不是固定在蝼蚁内;在稊稗内却不受其束缚;在瓦甓或屎溺内却又不受其局限或控制,这就是庄子所说的:「无所不在」和「无乎逃物」的超越性;故「周悉普 ,咸皆有道。此重言至道不逃乎物,虽有三名之异,其实理旨归则同一也。」(36) 罗光教授解释「周咸」三者乃说明「道」的无所不在:

「道」在万物,因「道」有周、 、咸三种特性。三种特性,名词不同,意义同是指「道在万物」。周,从上下说,「道」包括整个宇宙;,从平面说,「道」普遍及宇宙万物;咸,从分析说,「道」在每个物体。庄子用这三种特性说明「道」无所不在。(37)

  其实,庄子从「道」之内在万物,且每况愈下地说明,他的意思是要指出:愈卑下的事物愈能表现出「道」是无所不在的,是不离物的,即说「道」是「周全」、「普遍」和「完全」的。「周」、「偏」、「咸」三者虽从不同层面来说明「道」,但都是表示「道」的周遍于万物的特性,即「其指一也」。

  庄子在谈「道」之「无所不在」和「无乎逃物」的内在于万物又超越万物之后,更提出「道」超越万物的流转变化,更好说:「道」是不变的,不生不死的,能运作万物而自身却永不消失的。知北游中有言:

物物者与物无际,而物有际者,所谓物际者也;不际之际,际之不际者也。谓盈虚衰杀,彼为盈虚非盈虚,彼为衰杀非衰杀,彼为本末非本末,彼为积散非积散也。

这就是说:「物物者」即「道」,是没有界限的,「道未始有封」(齐物论),内在于万物中是没有分别的,但物却有界限有分别的,如人、树木、石头等是有界限有分别的;「道」则内在于人、又超越人;内在于树木又超越树木;内在于石头又超越石头。至于盈虚衰杀在于说明自然界万物的变化现象,故有盈虚的情状、衰杀的景况、本末的分别,积极的变化。(38)至于「道」,则为非物,不受盈虚、衰杀、本末、积散所影响,这可与大宗师篇所言的:「杀生者不死,生生者不生」的思想互相配合相应,即说明「道」的本身是不死不生的,超越生死变化。所以,庄子说:「彼(道也)为盈虚非盈虚……。」以肯定「道」的超越性:即超越盈虚、超越衰杀、超越本末、超越积散。成玄英疏:

富贵为盈、贫贱为虚;老病为衰杀;终始为本末;生来为积、死去为散。夫物物者非物,而生物谁乎?此明能物所物,皆非物也。物既非物,何盈虚衰杀之可语耶!是知所谓盈虚皆非盈虚。

富贵、贫贱、老病、终始、生死皆大自然中万物的现象,特别是指人生命历程的现象,唯有得道者,才能超越而「忘」去一切富贵、贫贱……而不受其束缚,逍遥自得地与道通合为一。而「道」本身就是「物物者」的非物,一定是超越这一切现象的变化。

3.4 道的整体性

「道」在庄子书中,除了展示出其「实存性」,由自存而至化生万物,成为宇宙万物的本根外;还展示了其内在于万物而又超越万物个别的局限,以及不陷于万物的流转变化中,自身乃不生不死不变的「超越性」的「道」。

  在此我们要说的是:在「道」的「实存性」和「超越性」的背后,「道」更蕴藏着「整体性」,这在庄子书的齐物论中,很清楚的得到肯定:

物固有所然,物固有所知。无物不然,无物不可。故为是攀莛与楹,厉与西施、恢 憰怪,道通为一。其分也,成也;其成也,毁也。凡物无成与毁,复通为一。

「道」从整体来看,是与万物通而为一的,即万物虽各不同,皆因「道」,而能与本根之「道」共通为「一」。若要详细地描述,就是指万物在「道」内具有「共通性」。我们可以分析「道通为一」的意义作为理解。

3.4.1

在庄子书中,有很多与「道通为一」的「一」之意有 关连性的思想,指出万物虽各有不同,却都出于同一 的根源,互相可在「道」内相通玄同的:

逍遥游:「旁礡万物以为一。」

齐物论:「天地一指也,万物一马也。」

德充符:「自其同者视之,万物皆一也。」

大宗师:「天地之一气。」

天地篇:「万物一府。」

秋水篇:「万物一齐。」

田子方:「万物之所一也。」

知北游:「通天下一气耳。」

「一」乃意指万物的「共通性」,即万物虽殊而同;因「道」无私地内在于万物中,使万物在「整体性」上,因着「道」而贯通为一。则阳篇说:「万物殊理,道不私」,此即「各物的样态千差万别,然而各物所寓的『理』却有其共通性;『道于私』意谓道具有其普遍性,普遍性的道,或是指万物所共同依循以运行的规律,或系指万物所同出的根源,或系万物所共同含有的原质。」(39)

3.4.2

「道通为一」的「一」就是指万物所具有的共通性;若按其内容言之,更是指「整体」而言。因其是「整体」的,故不分大小;因大是一个整体,小也是一个整体;不分丑美,因「道」的实存性内在万物中,生成之,使之存在,而存在本身是至美善的;故从「道」的角度看之就没有丑与美;犹如贵贱一样,在「道」中没有分别甚么是贵?甚么是贱?「以道观之,物无贵贱」(秋水篇);同时,也没有成与毁,因万物都在生生不息的变化过程中以显示「道」,一件事物的分离消解,会变成另一件新的事物;例如:一棵树被分割而成为木块,木块被制成桌子;即树被分割(毁)而成木块;木块被毁而成桌子,所以说:「其分也,成也;其成也,毁也。」这在大自然中,不论万物如何变化,是成是毁,其只是一部份,在「道」的整体上看,宇宙万物仍然是一个整体,故说:「凡物无成与毁,复通为一。」

「复通为一」即是说:无论事物的分与成、成与毁,都复归于「道」,归于一个「整体」。(40)

3.4.3

庄子在谈「道通为一」之前,已经从认识的观点上,提出「道」具有全面整体的意义:(41)

--道恶乎隐而有真伪?言恶乎隐而有是非?道恶乎往而不存,言恶乎存而不可?道隐于小成,言隐于荣华。……(齐物论)

整体性的「道」本是全面的,但往往被事物的「小成」所蒙蔽,即被片面的认识而阻碍了对「道」的全面认识,故不能「体悟」道整体性地内在于事物中,只停留在认识的「小知」的层面上,也就不能「忘」己地离形去知,而不能与道通为一。所以,人若要认识「道」的全面整体,必先去「成心」,不执「小知」,即不执「小成」。

--彼是莫得其偶,谓之道枢。枢始得其环中,以应无穷,是亦一无穷,非亦一无穷也。(齐物论)

「偶」乃指事物的对立,相对也。「道」是不对立的,尤其在「道」通为一中,一切都是共通的,即以「体道」的「真知」,将一切对立的皆通而为一,因为最高真知,是不分别物我,且与物为一,不见物之在外;对于是非彼此亦能齐一不分,忘生死、无爱憎的,即能超出事物的对立关系,故言「莫得其偶」。而「枢、要也」,其所指乃「道」为绝对的,不是相对的,故以道枢称之。(42)至于「环中」之义:「环非玉环之环,而为之借字。说文:圜,天体也。,规也。圆、圜全也。段玉裁谓许意言天,当作圜;言平圆,当作;言浑圆,当作。今字多作方圆,方员,而字遂废矣。愚按,尔雅释器,环谓之捐。王筠谓尔雅借捐为。据此,则环字即字。(43)……枢始得其环中以应无穷,宛然写出以机翦画圆形之状态矣。」(44)从环、圜、圆、圆四字的意义上看,我们可以说四字互相可以相通,有「全」的意义。(45)这可从寓言篇上所言得知:

始卒若环,莫得其伦,是谓天均。

成玄英疏曰:「均、齐也,谓天然齐等之道。」即「道」乃「圜而全」,也是「天均」,故「道」是整体的、绝对的,由道枢统合万物为一整体,故曰:「得其环中,以应无穷。」然而,我们也不能忽略庄子所言的「环中」的「中」字,中为空,枢始得其环中,即得其圆全之中,得到圆全的中空,才能通于一。因此,从整体上来看,「道」是在自然中通于万物而为一。

3.4.4

「道」既是「整体性」的,就没有界限而是无穷的,不是部份而是全部,不能分割,也就是「道枢」,即「道」是绝对的,不是相对的「偶」;反之,有界限,可分割成为部份,而有所对立的,就不是「道」。故庄子在认识「道」的特性中有言:「夫道未始有封」(齐物论)。「封」是界限、界域的意思,「未始有封」显然就是指「整全无分,完全纯真,且无所不在,荡然无际」(46)的状态。这状态所要说的是:「道」无「彼是」,故人要与「道」相通为一,必须「忘」彼是,即「齐」彼是:「是亦彼也,彼亦是也。」(按:彼是作「彼此」解。)

「道」无「是非」,庄子要人放弃「儒墨的是非」,因为「道」包容一切,且无容私;而「是非」乃人的成心、私心而产生的,故欲达道,必须「忘」是非,即「齐」是非,而「莫若以明」或「照之于天」。

「道」无「物我」,而是内在于「万物」中;因为「道」乃「未始有物」的,「有物」即有「物我」之分;「道」亦「未始有封」,「有封」便有界限之分,即有「彼此」之别。故人要得道,必须「忘」物我,即「齐」物我:「天地与我并生,而万物与我为一。」(齐物论)

「道」更无「生死」,即「不生不死」的「先天地生而不为久;长于上古而不为老」(大宗师),人要与「道」通一,必须了悟「齐」生死:「予恶乎知说(悦也)生之非惑邪!予恶予知恶死之非弱丧而不知归者邪!」(齐物论)此即「忘」生死也。

由是,在「道通为一」的「整体性」观念说,「齐物论」虽以认识的层面来言「道」,「大宗师」则以本根的层面来言「道」,其内容的中心点实际上是「互为表里」,不能分解的,故可以肯定:「庄子站在『道』的立场上来观察现实世界,来认识现实世界;其认识的结论就是『万物齐一』,就是『举莛与楹,厉与西施,恢 憰怪,道通为一』(齐物论)。」(47)所以,无论从本体论或认识论,在超越生命的历程中,人不断地迈向与道通合为一,将道开显出来,庄子便要求人应该仿效自然事物,「忘」知「忘」欲,即无知识和无情欲,顺应自然,安之若命以符合「道」的生化,如此才能合于「道」,犹如真人一样能登假于「道」,不伤生也不损道。(48)



21. 这里所言的「字」乃普遍的文字,不一定指哲学的名词,也不一定指思想范畴;其包括的内容是很广泛的,可能只是一个「虚」字,代表一件「事物」,也可能是哲学名词或思想范畴,故可称之为「文字」,即从文字学上立言。
22. 见《正中形音义综合大字典》,正中书局出版 1971年3月初版,「文」字614页又「字」字328页。
23. 冯友兰著,《中国哲学史》,商务印书馆 1961年 280页。
24. 李震,《中外形上学比较研究(上册)》,中央文物供应社发行1982年 6页。
25. 罗光著,《中国哲学思想史(先泰篇)》,学生书局 1982年 506页。
26. 严灵峰编著,《老列庄三子研究文集》经子丛书(第九册),国立编译馆 1983年 505页。
27. 刘笑敢著,《庄子哲学及其演变》,中国社会科学出版社 1988年2月 136-137页。
28. 陈品卿著,《庄子新探》,文史哲出版社 1984年9月 85页。
29. 张岱年著,《中国哲学发征》,山西人民出版社 1981年12月42页。
30. 罗光著,《中国哲学思想史(先泰篇)》,学生书局 1982年 503页。
31. 李震著,《中外形上学比较研究(上册)》,中央文物供应社发行 1982年 10页。
32. 张默生著,《庄子新释》,汉京文化事业有限公司印行 1983年9月 28-29页。
33. 陈鼓应的注释:「『太极』,通常指天地没有形成以前,阴阳未分的那股元气,这里或当指『天』。『六极』,即六合。」在陈鼓应的「庄子今注今译」一书中,已将「太极之先」改为「太极之上」,因此他又说:「『太极之上』,原作『太极之先』,依俞樾之说改。俞樾说:『按下云:<在六极之下,而不为深>,则此当云:<在太极之上>,方与<高>义相应。今作<在太极之先>,则不与<高>义相应,而转与下文<先天地生而不为久>其义相复矣。周易系辞曰:<易有太极。>释文曰:<太极,天地。>然则庄子原文,疑本作在<太极之上>,犹云在天之上也。后来说周易者,皆以太极谓天地未分之前,于是疑太极当以先后言,不当以上下言,乃改<太极之上>为<太极之先>,而于义不可通矣。准南子览冥篇曰:<引类于太极之上。>』按:俞说可从。」参见陈鼓应注译,《庄子今注今译》,中华书局(北京) 1988年1月第3版 182页。
34. 所谓超越时空不是指「超时空」之不在时空之内,而是说「道的超越性」,即不被时空所束缚却又内在于时空中,在老子道德经二十五章中言:「域中有四大。」四大包括了「道大」,即道在域中,可见没有说「道」在空间之外。
35. 李震著,《中外形上学比较研究(上册)》,中央文物供应社发行 1982年 11页。
36. 郭庆藩辑,《庄子集释》,河洛图书出版社 1974年3月 知北游第二十二 咸玄英疏 751页。
37. 光着,《中国哲学思想史(先泰篇)》,学生书局 1982年 525页。
38. 陈鼓应著,「经学、解话、诸子」,《庄子「道」的意义之解析》,大陆杂志语文丛书第三辑第一册,216页。
39. 陈鼓应著,「经学、解话、诸子」,《庄子「道」的意义之解析》,大陆杂志语文丛书第三辑第一册,220-221页。
40. 同上。
41. 吾人在道的本根中提出认识的观点,实在是以「整体性」的「道」,即由「道通为一」的思想作出发,其必包容「本根的道」和「认识的道」,因「以道观之」乃整体性的,可以包括一切不同的概念和范畴。目的要带出的是人的生命历程中的「体道」,以达到「忘」物我的与道合一。
42. 张默生著,《庄子新释》,满京文化事业有限公司印行 1983年9月 50页。
43. 查《中文大辞典(六)》玉部,台湾 中国文化大学印行 517页。
44. 曹受坤著,《庄子哲学》,文景出版社 1970年 19-21页。
45. 查《中文大辞典(六)》玉部,台湾 中国文化大学印行 517页。
46. 玄英疏:「夫道无不在,所在皆无,荡然无际,有何封域也。」李勉释:「道之为体,无是非之界,完全纯真。」(见《庄子总论及分篇评注》台湾商务)
47. 谢祥皓著,《庄子导读》,巴蜀书社 1988年 72-73页。
48. 李泽厚著,《漫述庄禅》哲学探索集,中国社会科学出版社 1988年 343-345页。

4. 结论 --有我与忘我在「道」中的通一

  在庄子形上哲学的思想看来,「道通为一」的「一」乃是「道」的超然状态,更能显示「道」是「自本自根以固存」的「实存」存有。若人能以「道」观物,那一切的事物都在「一」内成为一个「整体」,万物也便皆一,即德充符篇中所说:「自其异者视之,肝胆楚越也;自其同者视之,万物皆一也。」

  「自其同者视之」即「以道观之」,万物便没有分别相,秋水篇亦言:「以道观之,物无贵贱」,贵贱是人为价值分别,也因人的「成心」、「容私」而有的拘执,陷入生灭变化中,不能体悟:「凡物无成与毁,复通为一」(齐物论)的境界。

  因此,人当从大梦中觉悟,好使心灵活动免陷于偏见执着,照看万物的本然状态,大归地返其真:在「道」内成为「一」,因为「『一』即是意指破除封域而达到圆融和谐的境界。」(49)所以,当我们谈「道」的意义时,就是从人的认识上谈「道」,分析「道」,怎样谈也只是显示「道」自身,是「知识」认识的层面,这与庄子的本意似乎不能符合,因为庄子认为「知」是相对的,故强调「大知」(齐物论)和「真知」(大宗师),要求人必须:「堕肢体,黜聪明,离形去知,同于大通」(大宗师);在宥篇亦言:「堕尔形体、吐(黜)尔聪明,伦与物忘,大同于涬溟,解心释神,莫然无魂。」可见,要从体悟中,先「忘」物我,「忘」知,而有「气虚」之「心斋」(人间世),即能「吾丧我」(齐物论),以至于「无己、无功、无名」(逍遥游),便能「审乎无假,而不与物迁,命物之化而守其宗」(德充符),一切皆「依乎天理」(养生主),达到与「道」的「无私」之境:「游心于淡,合气于漠,顺物自然而无容私焉。」(应帝王)这就是庄子生命历程向「道」回归的「忘我终向」,即由知「道」而进入体「道」得「道」的「两忘而化其道」的境界,也就是庄子生命哲学的终极历程之「道通为一」的妙境。(50)

  陈鼓应在解析「道」的意义中也这样说:「在庄子看来,『道』是『整体』,就不能分割;有分割,就不是『道』了。有着『整体之道』的认识,自然能产生一种博大的心境;有着『万物皆一』的认识,自然能培养一种开放的心灵。博大的心境与开放的心灵,在精神上是自由自在,无执无系的。这样,庄子谈『道』(从齐物论篇来说),原是从认识论出发;然而,他的兴趣却不在于讨论客观性的知识,而在于藉此检讨主体心灵的境况。他所关注的是人在『体道』之后所达到的精神状态。」(51) 这种生命精神「体道」的境界可说是「道的境界」,是庄子生命精神的终极历程所要达到的「道通为一」的圆融境界,也即是「天地与我并生,而万物与我为一」(齐物论)、「上与造物者游,而下与外死生无终始者为友」(天下篇)的境界。

  庄子超越生命的历程从「忘」的思路以至与「道」通合为一,实在就是一个「忘我的终向」,终向的目标就是「道」,所以我们可以说:庄子的生命历程是一个「忘我」的历程;庄子的(生命)哲学是「忘我之学」。(52)

  庄子要关注的是人在日常生活中如何体「道」,然而在体「道」之先,人需「学」道和「闻」道,但不停滞于「学」与「闻」中;故在回归「道」的历程中,庄子更强调由人的日常生活之事里(即形下的现象),要求人用心去体悟,好能放弃使人离道的事与物,思与行,如是者,人无不感悟「道」之行乎人的生活的事事物物中,以体悟生活中的「道」,且与「道」契合,使自我的生命不断地攀假(登)于「道」境(形上的道),实现与「道」通一的境界。

  庄子的形上哲学不在于主宰世界,而是重视人在欣赏自然的美,走上忘物我的超越历程,与自然融为一体,即将生命转化成道,就是由形下转化成形上的追索,如鲲转化为大鹏,飞向天池,活在天池里的意境般;此刻,就是形下的一切,提升到形上,其提升的方式就是将形上内存于心灵之内,人的主体性行动,也与道的行动合一,共同缔造一个圆融的宇宙和人生。(53) 为现时代的需要反思,我们可以设想一下,庄子那一份忘物我的超然启发,使人与「道」相应通一,就是达到「寥天一」处;此刻,人若能「以道观之」的态度来观世界、观人性,即再回头看世界与人性,必然能互相欣赏和接纳,因为在此境界中,「物无贵贱」之分,以地为天,以天为地,亦必然说:「天之苍苍,其正色邪?其远而无所至极邪?其视下也,亦若是则已矣。」(逍遥游)这正是庄子哲学上一个极重要的转捩点:一个精神解放而走向高超境界的哲学家,同时还要渡着一种平易近人的生活,即尽管一个哲学家达到一种极高的境界,他也要回到现实世界上来;当他回到现实世界再看世界时,对于人世间的许多愚蠢、愚昧、错误的地方才可以原谅。如此,回到人世间,人世间便不是鄙陋世界。(54)



49. 陈鼓应著,「经学、解诂、诸子」,《庄子「道」的意义之解析》第三辑第一册,大陆杂志语文丛书 221页。
50. 严灵峰编著,《老列庄三子研究文集》经子丛书(第九册),国立编译馆 1983年 527-537页。
51. 陈鼓应著,「经学、解诂、诸子」,《庄子「道」的意义之解析》第三辑第一册,大陆杂志语文丛书 221页。
52. 王叔岷说:「庄子重忘我……大智忘我。……庄子,大智人也。庄子之学乃忘我之学。」见《庄学管窥》,艺文印书馆 1978年 11页。
53. 邬昆如著,《中国形上学的三个向度》哲学与文化月刊345,第三十卷第二期,台湾辅仁大学 哲学与文化月刊杂志社出版 2003年2月 15页。
54. 方东美著,《原始儒家道家哲学》,黎明文化事业公司 1983年9月 42-43, 250页。
第二十四卷 (2003年) 网上圣经:实况与前瞻
作者:李子忠

1. 圣经网页

「天国又好像撒在海里的网,网罗各种的鱼。网一满了,人就拉上岸来,坐下,捡好的,放在器皿里;坏的,扔在外面。在今世的终结时,也将如此:天使要出去,把恶人由义人中分开,把他们扔在火 里;在那里要有哀号和切齿。这一切你们都明白了吗?」他们说:「是的」。他就对他们说:「为此,凡成为天国门徒的经师,就好像一个家主从他的宝库里,提出新的和旧的东西。」(玛13:47-52)

这段耳熟能详的福音比喻,正好反映出网络神学的情形,尤其是网上圣经的实况。「互联网」好比撒在海里的网,网罗各种鱼类。这些渔获包括各种资讯,有善的、有恶的、甚至带有病毒的,我们都要一一「拉上岸来,坐下,捡好的,放在器皿里(my favorites、add bookmark);坏的,扔在外面(delete)。」可是这「拣鱼」的行动并不容易,首先因为「网了许多鱼,网险些破裂了」(路5:6);其次是鱼类林林总总,目不暇给,就如耶稣复活后那次渔获竟有153条(若21:11):这数字是当时希腊文化概指世上所有鱼类,今日的网页又何止153个?

为了推行网络神学,首先要认识实况,对各种神学资讯加以判辨。神学的基础是圣经,而圣经的研究在最近两个世纪中突飞猛进,加上互联网的协助,圣经学的传播与交流更形迅速。但我们不得不承认,网络资讯虽然是大势所趋,但实际只能触及先进国家和一些发展中的国家,对于大部分第三世界地区而言,这仍是不毛之地。今日世界经济命脉与资讯科技息息相关,而大部分第三世界地区却无法参与,同样网络神学也容易成为富裕国家的基督徒「奢侈品」,与世上大部分兄弟姊妹的实况脱节。尤有甚者,一些基督徒竟以自己富裕的生活,作为基督信仰优越和实效的证据。话虽如此,我们仍不可轻易放过资讯科技(IT)这个天主给现代人的恩赐,我们目前所要做的就是数据整理(Data Processing = DP),亦即若望所说的:「不要凡神就信,但要考验那些神(Dokimazete ta Pneumata = DP)是否出于天主,因为许多假先知来到了世界上。」(若一4:1)这行动亦即保禄所指的「辨别神类(Diakriseis Pneumaton =DP)」(格前12:10)。辨别资讯,可谓今日「辨别神类」的一个具体环节。

网上研究圣经首先要拥有信实可靠的圣经文本,可以随时阅览和下载,并加以处理和应用(如copy、paste)。圣经文本分原文及译文:制作圣经文本的网页,在译文方面则常会涉及版权问题。按一般常例,任何属知识产权的作品,在五十年内均享有版权,随阅览外,不得擅自以任何方式采用。在圣经原文及古译文方面并没有版权问题,只须自行输入,但在网页制作上却有许多技术问题,诸如特殊字库、右至左排序(如希伯来文旧约)、和字体兼容性等问题。目前已有数个圣经原文及古译文的网页,可供自由下载及应用,但部分也列出应用守则及需要预先取得密码。至于圣经译本方面,则要面对版权问题,这不仅是经济收益的问题,尤其更是文责上的问题(许多网上译本的文本错漏百出!)。一些网页提也提供与圣经研究有关的网页连结,并附有圣经文本的搜寻器/检索器,颇像昔日的「圣经词汇索引」(Bible Concordance)的功能。(注意:许多网址经常变更,有时需要用网名或作者来搜寻。本文最初发表于二○○○年五月,至今二○○三年十一月时,许多网页已更改,故需重新撰写,加入最新资料。)

2. 天主教中文圣经网页

本文集中讨论天主教的中文圣经网页:它们全以思高圣经(SBF 1968)为文本,大部分或只有新约全书,或包括全部新约和部分旧约,少数兼具简/繁体新旧约全书。一些网页也有搜寻器。

2.1

现有中文天主教圣经网页,全部都只能下载繁体中文圣经,若要在网上浏览全部简、繁体天主教中文圣经新旧约,可在香港教区的《西环圣母玫瑰堂网页》(Our Lady of the Rosary Church)内找到。这网页的网上圣经分为「繁体旧约圣经」、「繁体新约圣经」、「简体旧约圣经」和「简体新约圣经」。这是目前最齐备的简、繁体天主教中文新、旧约全书。内容全按思高版中文圣经列出,附有标题和分段,经文则采用逐句方式列出。这网页暂未有搜寻器。

该堂区原计划于二○○○年六月,在堂区网页上转载台湾地区主教团的网上圣经。但鉴于当时下载速度非常缓慢,而且教区内一直未有网上简体圣经,因此决定自行制作。二○○○年十一月完成了全部新约和部分旧约,二○○一年一月更在思高圣经学会的协助下,完成其余的旧约部分。该网页原想把简、繁体文本平行对照地列出,但鉴于技术问题未能实现。这网页上的简、繁体中文均可列印出来,但若要利用copy及paste的指令处理简体文本,则可能因字库问题而有所限制。

   网址: http://www.olrchurch.net 或 

       http://olrchurch.catholic.org.hk

2.2

《思高圣经学会网页》(Studium Biblicum Franciscanum),暂时并不提供该会经多次校对及更正的中文圣经文本网上版,只连结至学会正式授权香港西环圣母玫瑰堂所制作的圣经网页(见上述2.1)。学会在过去三年一直全力筹备及制作中文圣经光盘(见下述3、天主教中文圣经光盘),目前只提供以Bible Reader for Palm形式,用于电子手帐的「思高中文译本电子格式」,稍后才考虑发展网上圣经。

   网址:http://www.sbofmhk.org

2.3

《九龙华仁圣经网》(Wah Yan Biblenet)由一个学校网页发展而来,虽然网页仍在初步阶段,但其构思颇有创意。网页负责人「邀请和要求学生制作相关的互联网页,让师生在网上浏览时亦有机会接触到基督信仰。」这网页包括「网上圣经」、「圣经研读」和「圣经史略」等项目。

「网上圣经」提供新旧约经书,经文连各书引言、分段、标题和文本,全按思高圣经列出。目前已上网的经书包括旧约中的创、出、肋、户、申、苏、民、卢(兼具注释)。其他三十八卷旧约经书均未有文本,但其中十八卷则已载入引言(撒上下、列上下、编上下、厄上下、多、友、艾、加上下、箴、训、智、依、哀)。新约二十七卷方面,已上网的共有二十四卷(尚欠得后、犹、默),但只有文本而无引言和注释。

「圣经研读」包括「专题研究」和「章节详解」。「专题研究」只有三个主题文章,即耶稣诞生(玛1:1-2:19; 谷1:26-2:20),洗者若翰(玛3:1-12; 谷1:1-13; 路3:1-18)和耶稣受洗(玛3:13-17; 谷1:9-11; 路3:21-22)。至于「章节详解」似乎是一项非常庞大的注释计划,但至今尚未展开。

「圣经史略」列出了一些与圣经有关的历史及教义,包括「新旧约全书总论」、「圣经概说」、「圣传与圣经」(取材自梵二的「启示宪章」)、「天主教中文圣经翻译简史」(取材自思高的《圣经简介》,1981年)、「圣经书卷对照表」(即天主教与基督教圣经各书名称及简称对照,以及英文圣经各书名称及简称)。

   网址:http://biblenet.wyk.edu.hk

2.4

天主教台湾地区主教团(Chinese Regional Bishops' Conference in Taiwan)设有精美的《天主教中文圣经网页》(CCbible)。网页载有完整的思高版圣经文本。这圣经网页的版面左栏用作选择新旧约各书。经文内容以逐句方式列出,还附有思高版的大、小标题,各以不同颜色标示:经文及节数为黑色,大标题及章数为红色,小标题为褐色,非常醒目。下载的经文也可透过copy及paste指令,转载到其他软件程式上。

新约部分还附有「思高圣经搜索引擎」,转载自香港大学天主教医科学生会(Medic Cell)的「圣经查询」(http://216.22.148.204/cgi-bin/bible-database.cgi)。只需在search项内键入要搜寻的中文词汇,然后在书名小格中选取要搜寻的书,再按一下页底的「送出查询」指令,便可得出包含该词汇的所有经句。若不指定要查询的书名,便会搜寻全部新约。若对查询方法有疑问,可按版面右上角的「指示」指令,学习使用查询的方法。search项空格右方,有or及and两项选择。若要查询两个或以上的词汇(如格前的「智慧」与「记载」),先在search项空格内键入这些词汇,但词汇与词汇之间要保留一空位,然后选择or便会得出词汇单独或一起出现的经句(如格前1:19,20,21,22……);若选择and便会得出两个词汇一起(相隔不远)出现的经句(如格前1:19及3:19)。(可惜香港大学天主教医科学生会的「圣经查询」最近似乎已停止运作!)

   网址:http://www.catholic.org.tw/bible

台湾天主教会还设有另一名为《天主教资讯小集》(Catholic Information Links)的网页(网址:http://www.cathlinks.org),在其中的「圣经」一栏,除思高圣经外,也载有RSV, NAB, DRB, VULGATE四个外语译本,还有The Bible Gateway的连结,以及一些录自《天主教教理》的圣经教义导论(默感、解释、正典等)。此外,还附上李哲修神父编着的《圣经十讲》和孙茂学神父着的《福音默想》。

另一个台湾天主教网页《天主教之声》(网址:http://www.cathvoice.org.tw),除连结到主教团的「中文圣经」外,还设有一个「天主教圣经函授课程」,提供廿一个新约圣经课程,可供网上报读。

2.5

北京的《上智网站》(Catholic Sapientia Online)提供简体字的思高中文新旧约全书。圣经文本全按思高圣经的分段与标题,以逐句方式列出。虽然许多繁体天主教中文圣经网页尚缺几部旧约经书,这简体中文圣经网页却已齐备。网页也包括「检索器」,是目前唯一可以检索全部天主教圣经词汇的网页。检索器效律颇高,词汇以红色连经句一并列出,十分醒目,而且可同时检索全部新旧约。可惜检索器只能用简体字输入法。例如:「若望」一词因简繁体相同,可用这检索器找到,但「伯多禄」一词的简繁体不同,无法以繁体输入法检索。这网页上的简体中文均可列印出来,或利用copy及paste的方式处理简体文本,但有可能因字库问题而有所限制。网页亦设有称为「了解圣经」的论坛,可发表或转载有关圣经的文章或读经心得。

   网址:http://www.shangzhi.org

2.6

海外华人教会方面,新加坡教区的「天主教华文教务委员会」(Commission for Apostolate of Mandarin-Speaking, CAMS),在名为《狮城之光网页》的简体中文网页上,加设了全年的「每日读经」和「网上学圣经」,全部均为简体字。「每日读经」列出平日两篇和主日三篇读经的章节数目,但只附有福音的全部章节内容,和福音前欢呼词经句。「网上学圣经」是个有系统的圣经自学课程,至今已推出了廿八课「新约读要」和十五篇「圣经简介」。最特别的地方,是在「圣经简介」每一课后设有「考一考自己」是非题测验,使这课程兼具互动学习的特性。

   网址:http://www.cams.org.sg

3. 天主教中文圣经光盘

酝酿多时的《思高圣经光盘版》(SBOFM Bible CD),终于在二○○三年七月面世。这计划是思高圣经电子电脑化进程之一,是学会亲自和直接制作及发展的电脑及网上圣经计划的一部分。这光盘备有简繁体中文文本,专为互动研经而设(暂不可直接由光盘下载经文备用)。日后预计还会推出其他用途的圣经光盘,以至发展思高圣经学会的「网上圣经」,届时各界人士可自由从网上下载准确的圣经文本,方便在研经时列印出所需经文部分。

《思高圣经光盘版》由四大单元组成,分别是「圣经经文」、「教会圣经训导文献」、「中文圣经译本史」和「旧约经外文献」,现简略分述如下:

3.1 「圣经经文」(Biblical Texts)

这光盘所提供的圣经文本,在输入文字过程中,曾经历不少于十多次的校对,务求尽量避免错误。这工作除有圣经学者、编辑、电脑专业人士参与外,还有数十名热心的志愿工作者协助,他们的努力和专业精神,不下于昔日的圣经抄写员,实在值得向他们致敬。因此,这光盘所载的圣经文本,较诸目前在网上提供的所有思高版圣经更为精确。

「圣经经文」的工作台,是按互动研经的需要而设计,分上列、中列、下列三区。上列是选项,包括〔全文检索〕、〔书目〕和〔经卷章数〕。〔全文检索〕可在新旧约全书中寻找所输入的「词组」。〔书目〕选定要显示的「经书」及有关的「总论」、「引论」或「引言」。〔经卷章数〕决定所选取经卷的「章数」。中列是显示圣经文本的地方,附上不同的「连结」,分为左、中、右三栏。左栏显示「章节数目」,点击之便可得出思高圣经的〔注释连结〕,若「章节数目」旁有「※」号,点击之可得出有关的〔旧约经外文献连结〕。中栏显示思高版中文「圣经文本」,点击文本中的词语,可得出相应的〔辞典连结〕。右栏列出〔经文对照连结〕,点击之可得出相应的「参照经文」。下列是〔附加视窗〕,用作显示「经文注释」、「经外文献」、「辞典条目」和「参照经文」。

3.2 「教会圣经训导文献」(Documents of the Church Magisterium on Holy Scriptures)

这单元是其他网页或光盘所没有的,包括教会自第二世纪至今的所有「圣经训导文献」共124条,按段落分列成2015项。当中四个文献译自希腊文原文(2, 3, 4, 20条),五个译自意大利文原文(42, 47, 77, 82, 108条),六个译自法文原文(89, 107, 117, 121, 122, 123条),一个译自英文原文,其余108个译自拉丁文原文。最后还附上一九二四年首届中国全国教会会议的有关圣经训导。全部文献分成四组,方便检阅:一至五世纪(11条),六至十世纪(6条),十一至十五世纪(8条),十六至廿一世纪(99条),另附录(1条)。

这些教会训导文献,有些来自历届大公会议(如梵二的「启示宪章」1965),有些来自不同的地区会议,有些则来自圣座的平常训导,包括教宗通谕(如「上智者天主」1893、「施慰者圣神」1920)、教廷各圣部文告(如「各教派合作翻译圣经指引」1987)、宗座圣经委员会文告(如「教会内的圣经诠释」1993)等。这些文献让我们认识到教会历来对实践和诠释圣经的态度:由初期专注于「正典」、「无误」和「默感」的课题,后来对基督新教对圣经的立场和释经法的疑虑,及至教宗比约十二世的「圣神默感」通谕(1943)所掀起的革命性和开放态度,以及梵二至今的公教释经学新发展。这些文献大部分属于历史记录性质,除涉及信理和伦理者外,并不一定是教会最后和决定性的训导,仅代表教会对圣经研究态度的演变历程,这点尤其在圣经委员会于一九四八年后的文告中说明了。

3.3 「中文圣经译本史」(History of Chinese Versions of the Holy Scriptures)

「中文圣经译本史」让我们对中文圣经的翻译有一个概括的认识,并附上早期中文译本的珍贵图片。共分为七个条目: 1.最早期景教译经历史、2.孟高维诺主教的传教事业与译经工作、3.十六至十七世纪耶稣会传教士的译经工作、4.十八至二十世纪的圣经翻译、5.思高译本、6.东正教的中文圣经、7.基督教的中文圣经译本(马礼逊译本、马士曼译本、委办译本、和合译本、华人翻译的基督教中文圣经译本、现代中文译本、圣经新译本)。最后以「天主教与基督教中文圣经译本的简略比较」作结束。

3.4 「旧约经外文献」(Extra-biblical Texts Related to the Old Testament)

在光盘中加入「经外文献」的目的,是为圣经研究提供一些历史和文化背境,一如梵二「启示宪章」所要求者:「释经者必需寻找圣经作者在固定的环境中,按他们的时代与他们的文化背景,用当时通用的文学类型,企图表白及表白出来的意思。于是,为正确地了解圣经写作者所欲陈述的,应当注意到圣经写作者的时代所流行的,以及当代习用的感受、说话和叙述的方式,也当注意到同时代的人们,彼此往来惯用的那些方式。」(启示12)

本光盘所收录的古代近东「经外文献」共三十九条,目前只有与旧约相关的部分,并附有大英博物馆所提供的文物图片。文献当中较为人认识的包括:哈慕辣彼法典、阿玛尔纳函件、默乃弗大石碑、阿门摩培训诲篇、革则尔年历、默沙石碑、厄鲁玛厄里市创造史诗、基耳加默市故事、拉基士函件、阿希加训诲篇等。希望日后还可加入一些「新约经外文献」。

值得一提的是,光盘部分内容已分别以单行本方式出书:《圣经》(1968),《圣经辞典》(1975)。另外,《教会圣经训导文献》已在排版中,其余的《中文圣经译本史》和《旧约经外文献》,亦会考虑于不久的将来付印。

4. 基督教中文圣经网页

中文圣经方面,基督教的网页也有不少,仅略举如下:

4.1

《网络圣经》(网络基督使团Chinese Christian Internet Mission)包括英文钦定译本(KJV)、简易英文译本(BBE)、美国标准译本(ASV)、简/繁体中文和合本(UV-GB/UV-Big5)、简/繁体吕振中译本(LZZ-GB/LZZ-Big5)、简/繁体中文新译本(NChV-GB/NChV-Big5)。这网络圣经的各译本均可独立显示,或以中英对照方式显示。在「圣经学习工具」一项里设有搜寻器(圣经查询),供查询句子或词组,并设有经书简介及注释(查经指南)。在「圣经资源」一项里,可以下载不同的圣经译本(下载圣经),查询海外购买中文圣经的地方(圣经书店指引),以及找到一些有用的圣经网址(网络圣经指引)。

   网址:http://www2.ccim.org/~bible/hb5.html

4.2

《谭永锋的中文圣经工具》(Frank Tang's Chinese Bible Tool)由一九九七年发展至今已到了第四版,是目前中文圣经工具中最完备者,分为(a)「繁体中文圣经阅读」、(b)「简体中文圣经阅读」、(c)「中英对照圣经阅读」、(d)「中文圣经投影专用版」等四大项。

(a/b)「繁/简体中文圣经阅读」是专为中文研读及查圣经而设的。

-阅读圣经:为阅读一章圣经,先在左上方之〔阅读控制栏〕选取欲读之书名,然后选取欲读之章数,并按下〔阅读〕键,左下方之〔阅读内容栏〕便会显示该章圣经。使用者可用每章章名下的〔〕阅读前或后一章圣经。若按下每章章名下〔〕,电脑便会播放由Family Radio International播放的中文圣经录音档(mp3)。若按下〔〕或〔α〕,便会载入原文(希伯来文或希腊文)圣经资讯:包括原文「语态说明」(可选择列出「Strong条号」与否),「中/希对照」(可选择以条列、表格或整段形式显示)。使用者更可按下每节前的节点,把该节移到页顶,或用此节点在Words或其他html editor中建立连结。

-查询圣经:在右上方之〔查询控制栏〕选取查询之词,然后按下〔查询〕键,右下方之〔查询内容栏〕便会显示该章圣经及所查经节总数,查获经节数。使用者按下每节前的节点,便会把该章圣经载入左下方之〔阅读内容栏〕,以便查清查询结果的上下文。若仅欲列出经节名称,而不要经文内容,可在〔查询文字栏〕左侧作「」使用者可在右上方之〔查询控制栏〕,限定查询范围为「经集」、「单卷」或「单卷单章」;若限定它为「经集」,便可选定「全本圣经」、「旧约圣经」、「新约圣经」、「摩西五经」、「旧约历史书」、「诗歌智慧」、「大先知书」、「小先知书」、「福音及行传」、「保罗书信」或「其他书信」(全、旧、新、五、史、诗、大、小、福、保、他)。若限定它为「单卷」,便可指定一书名。若限定它为「单卷单章」,便可指定一书名和一章数。若想快速修改查询为经集之一,可按右下方查询结果上列的十一个〔快选连结〕。

(c) 中英文圣经对照阅读:本项专为用英文圣经对照来辅助中文研读并查考圣经而设。先在上方之〔阅读控制栏〕选取欲读之书名,然后选取欲读之章数,再选取欲读之中英文圣经版本,下方两个〔阅读内容栏〕便会依所选取改换内容。

(d)中文圣经投影专用版:本项专为投影圣经,以供聚会团体观看:设计用了反白大字,方便控制员跟随讲者显示所提及的经文。应用时,先按〔F11〕键切换至全萤幕。切换内容时,先在下方〔书名选单〕选择书名,继在〔章数选单〕选择章数,再在〔节数选单〕选择节数,然后按下〔阅读〕改换显示内容。投影时,可随时切换繁体/简体或变字体大小。当控制员载入「投影专用版」后,右下方的〔快速选单〕原为空白,每次按〔阅读〕后,此〔快速选单〕便会把所显示「经节」记入,以便再次参考,控制员一旦选取某一项,所显示的内容即刻换至选取经节及字体大小。要清除〔快速选单〕内容,只需按Shift键及Refresh来重新载入。若按显示内容中的左方经节号,便会使该节整齐换到荧幕最上方。

   网址:http://people.netscape.com/ftang/BIBLE/ v2frame.html

基督教圣经网页还有很多,当中不乏有份量者。当然,也有一些网页摆出基督教的名义,而其内容却甚有问题,对于这些问题网页,不论天主教或基督教的兄弟姊妹,都要十分小心辨别。值得一提的是,大部分基督教圣经网页都不会包括旧约的「次正经」(Deuterocanonical),即多俾亚传、友弟德传、玛加伯上下、智慧篇、德训篇、巴路克这七卷书,以及达尼尔和艾斯德尔的补篇。这些网页的搜寻器或圣经工具,多不包括这些经卷的内容,因此,若只以这些网页作圣经研究的资料来源,便会忽略了这部分的天主启示内容。

5. 网上圣经原文及外语译本

有关圣经原文及外语译本的网页有很多,当中的英语译本更是琳琅满目:

5.1

Bible Gateway(Nick Hengeveld-Gospel Communication Network)包括八个英文(NIV、KJV、NKJV、NASB、RSV、DARBY、YLT、WE)及十五个其他外语译本(法LSG、BDS;德ELB;意CEI、LND;拉VULGATE;挪DNB;葡NVI;西NVI、RVA;瑞SVL、SV;菲BIBINT;阿ARABIC;荷HTB),设有搜寻器。

   网址:http://bible.gospelcom.net/bible

5.2

New American Bible(National Conference of Catholic Bishops/United States Catholic Conference)这个美国天主教主教团的网页,列出美国天主教圣经协会(Catholic Biblical Association of America)所译的NAB,附各书引言及注释。

   网址:http://www.nccbuscc.org/nab/bible/index.htm

最近梵蒂冈官方纲页采用徼logos IntraText把NAB圣经文本转成有互助功能的lexical hypertext,内容包括「文本」、「词汇索引」、「词表」、「词汇频度」。除NAB外,网页也提供意文CEI及拉丁通行本VULGATE,但拉丁版暂没有IntraText之功能。(除圣经外,也以IntraText方式提供《天主教教理》和《天主教法典》,语言包括英、意、法、德、西。)

   网址:http://www.vatican.va/archive/bible/index.htm

5.3

Bible Study Tools on Goshen(Crosswalk)除列出二十个英文译本(NAS、ASV、TMB、KJV、NKJV、NLT、NRS、RSV、TEV、DRB、NCV、GWT、WEB、BEB、DARBY、HNV、WEBSTER、VULGATE、YLT、WES-NT),六个其他外语共十三个译本(阿SVD、法LSG、OST、德ELB、LUTHER、意DIODATI、LND、RIVEDUTI、俄RSP、RST、IOU、西BLA、BRV)外,主要是提供研究圣经的工具:搜寻器,希伯来文及希腊文与英文的遂字对照(Gk & Heb interlinear Bible),圣经辞典(Gk & Heb lexicons),圣经词汇索引(四本),圣经字典(六本),圣经百科全书(两本),圣经平行对照(七个语言共三十三个译本),是目前最齐备的外语(尤其英语)圣经研究网页之一,但鉴于版权问题,许多工具书属过时作品,未能包括最新的圣经学资料。

   网址:http://bible.crosswalk.com  

5.4

All-in-One Biblical Resources Search(Mark Goodacre-BirminghamUniv)正如其网名All-in-One所说,这网页综合了许多圣经网页的搜寻器(见Bible Versions & Translations),当中包括Unbound Bible、Bible Browser、The Bible Gateway、Bible Study Tools on Goshen、Greek & Hebrew Interlinear Bible、Olive Tree Bible Software、Blue Letter Bible、The NET Bible。也综合了其他重要的圣经研究网页(见Biblical Resources Sites),包括The NT Gateway、Resources Pages for Biblical Studies、Bibelwissenschaft、The Text This Week、Felix Just's Biblical Resources、Web Nexus、Second Temple Synagogues、Review of Biblical Literature、Theoldi: Documentation of Theological & Interdisciplinary Literature。又收集了一些与圣经有关的古代世界资料网页(Ancient World),包括Christian Classics Etheral Library、Nag Hammadi Library、Argos、Lindell-Scott-Jones Greek Lexicon、Ancient/Classical History、The Perseus Project。还有一些有关宗教总论的网页(General Academic & Religion)。

   网址:http://www.bham.ac.uk/theology/goodacre/multibib.htm  

5.5

Resource Pages for Biblical Studies(Torrey Seland-Volda College-Norway)共分为四页:Bible Texts, Translations & Related Texts、Biblical Studies Electronically Published、Aspects of the Mediterranean Social World、Philo of Alexandria Page。

   网址:http://www.torreys.org/bible  

5.6

NET Bible(Bible Studies Foundation)这个圣经网页只有一个英文译本NET,设有章节搜寻器及两种注释(Translator's notes及Study notes)。此外,亦有丰富的圣经问题专论(见Bible Studies),包括OT by book or topic、NT by book or topic、Theology、Spiritual Life、Church History、Pastoral Helps、Prof's Soapbox。

   网址:http://www.bible.org

5.7

Theology Library: Sacred Scripture(Jerry Darring-Spring Hill College)提供许多圣经网页资料,包括The Bible Online、Official Documents、The Bible、Hebrew Scriptures、Christian Bibles、Directories。

   网址:http://www.shc.edu/theolibrary/bible  

5.8

Bible Browser(Richard Goerwitz)提供RSV、KJV、VULGATE、DARBY、WEY-NT、ASV、BEB、NWAB、YLT九个译本,又可同时平行显示不同译文。其搜寻器有多种搜寻功能,包括phrase(短句)、passage(段落)、keyword or exact string(关键词king)、sub-string(词系king, kings, kingdom……)、word pattern(词序King……, ……king……, ……king)、logical operation(逻辑and, or, not)、multi-word search(多字搜寻)等。(注意:这网页暂时停止运作)

   网址:http://www.stg.brown.edu/webs/bible_browser/pbeasy.shtml

5.9

ARTFL Project-Multilingual Bible(Mark Olsen-ChicagoUniv)提供KJV、LUTHER、LSG、VULGATE四个文本,并附多功能搜寻器。

   网址:http://www.lib.uchicago.edu/efts/ARTFL/public/bibles

5.10

Jewish Publication Society Bible(Breslov Chassidus Movement)提供希伯来文旧约经文(Massoretic, Hebrew, Aramaic)及注释(Hebrew),同时提供两个犹太人的英文译本(JPS、KAPLAN)及注释,并附搜寻器。

   网址:http://www.breslov.com/bible

6. 有关网上圣经的一些反思及前瞻

在网络上提供阅览圣经原文及各种译本,实在对圣经和神学的研究有很大的帮助,对天主圣言的广传也有意想不到的效果。圣咏上的话:「高天陈述天主的光荣,穹苍宣扬祂手的化工;日与日侃侃而谈,夜与夜知识相传。不是语,也不是言,是听不到的语言;它们的声音传遍普世,它们的言语达于地极。」(咏19:2-5)网上圣经确是那「听不到的语言」,然而却「传遍普世…达于地极」,无孔不入,无远弗届。

但圣经网页也并非无往而不利的,它最常遇到的问题,就是资源短缺。首先是缺少赞助人,又没有广告收益,再加上技术人材缺乏,往往使这极具潜力的福传和学术工作停滞不前,甚或半途而癈。制作一个网页并不太困难,但往往缺乏(非志愿)全职工作人员按时更新、输入新资料、不断更正错漏……这些因素正是网页寿终正寝的主要原因。为了这原故,我们使用这些网页时,必须多加注意及校对圣经文本,这是运用任何网上资讯都会遇到的问题。

圣经词汇搜寻器(search engine)是这类网页的重要贡献之一,相对之下,翻阅半尺厚的圣经词汇索引(Bible Concordance),实在费时失事。但目前的中文圣经搜寻器未算精密,没有一个可与Bible Browser的搜寻器相比。换句话说,若只利用现有中文圣经搜寻器作研究圣经的工具,往往会有许多遗漏。但即使有强力和多功能的搜寻器,也未必能涵盖某些圣经概念。举个例说,一些有关「天主的公义」这概念的重要章节,可能完全没有采用「公义」的常用词汇,因而逃过了搜寻器的追踪。在这点上,传统的圣经神学辞典仍大有用场。

圣经学并不是一门统计学,词汇索引和网页搜寻器,只能视作一种基础研究工具。这些机械化的圣经研究,若不能配合教父和教会传统的精粹,只会得出令人啼笑皆非的结论。早期出产的圣经电脑软件,就曾有这样一个毛病:某词汇在圣经上出现超过某次数后,便无法用搜寻器检索。这些词汇多是些常用的虚词,没有特殊意义,兼且消耗大量的存储体。这样一来,出现次数极多,而且是最重要的「天主」一词,便无法找到──圣经中竟没有「天主」!一九九七年曾轰动一时的《圣经密码》(Michael Drosnin, The Bible Code)一书,正是电脑圣经研究得出的怪胎,是现代曲解附会(eisigesis)的典型例子。(今日网络上仍可找到专为寻找圣经密码的程式和软件下载!)如果人类的得救确实系于这些密码,那么我们也要像耶稣的门徒般说:「这样,谁还能得救呢?」(玛19:25)但我们相信,天主的话是为叫我们明白的,并藉此而得救,正如耶稣在默示录所说的:「你不可密封本书的预言,因为时期已临近了。」(默22:10)他又说:「那诵读和那些听了这预言,而又遵行书中所记载的,是有福的!因为时期已临近了。」(默1:3)圣经的信息绝非什么秘而不露的密码!

综观时下的圣经网页,很少提供教父和教会传统对圣经的宝贵解释。这些早期的圣经研究,虽然没有我们现代的科技协助,却不比现代的圣经学逊色。因为诚如奥利振(Origen)所说:「与其说圣经写在书卷上,毋宁说首先写在教会的心头上」(Sacra Scriptura principalibus est in corde Ecclesiae quam in materialibus instrumentis scripta)。教会对圣经的这些生活体验和洞识,理应在今日的网络神学上占一席位,否则我们便是浪费了教会的至宝。

要充实现时的天主教中文圣经网页,我们必须提供准确的圣经文本,制作更完善的搜寻器,连结其他有用的中外及教内外的圣经网页,开设讨论群组,罗列有关圣经学的参考资料,加入实用和有学术性的注解、灵修性的导读和默想,附上方便查阅的词汇解释、辞典、地图、历史文化背景导论、圣经语文学习等。

此外,年青的一代对互联网资讯十分敏锐,我们也不可忽略制作适合儿童和青年的圣经网页,既要生动有趣,又有互动学习的机会。犹太人为协助各家庭认识古老的宗教传统,制作了无数网页。例如有关逾越节(Pesach-Passover)的网页就不少于一千个,大部分都设计精美,富有趣味,并且资料充足,实在值得我们借镜,以制作渗入家庭的教理讲授。

这似乎是个很庞大的计划,没有决心、人力和财力,是做不来的。我们需要的除了技术和设计人员外,更重要的是有内涵的圣经学和神学人材。在这方面,教区、教省、全国性、以至全球华人教友的合作,尤其重要。这要视乎我们对这使命的认同:我们是否承认这是一项迫切的任务,与我们的教友使命和福传息息相关?

教宗若望保禄二世在第廿四届世界传播节上谈及电讯时说:「电脑电讯的来临,以及电脑参与系统的出现,使教会有更多完成她使命的工具。这些有助教会成员间沟通和对话的方法,可以加强他们的团结合一。直接收放资讯的技术使教会更有效地与现代世界保持对话……藉着这个新的电脑文化,教会更易于把她的信仰告知全世界,向世人解释她对某些问题及事件所持立场的理由……她能够更清楚听到公众的意见,并与她周围的世界不断进行对话,更直接参与共同寻求解决人类大家庭的迫切问题」(若望保禄二世,「世界传播节文告」,1990年1月24日)。

二○○二年耶稣升天节,教宗若望保禄二世发表了一篇有关互联网的文告。他把这新资讯媒介比喻作古罗马的「市集广场」,他认为教会也应善用这工具来传播福音,尤其作为人们初步接触基督喜讯的机会。但他同时认为,互联网并不能取代传统的福传工作:亲身见证信仰仍是必需的。教宗的这一席话,实在值得我们多加反省。

附注:一些本文论及的圣经译本简称

ASV---American Standard Version

BDS---Bible de Semeur (French)

BEB---Bible in Basic English

BIBINT---Bibles International (Tagalog)

BLA---La Biblia de las Americas (Spanish)

CEI---Conferenza Episcopale Italiana (Italian)

DARBY---Darby

DIODATI---Diodati (Italian)

DNB---Det Norsk Bibelselskap (Norwegian)

DRB---Douay- Rheims Bible

ELB---Elberfelder (German)

GWT---God's Word Translation

HNV---Hebrew Names Version

HTB---Het Boek (Netherlandish)

IOU---Ivan Ogienko Ukrainian Bible (Ukrainian)

KJV---King James Version (=Authorized Version)

LZZ---Lu Zheng Zhong吕振中译本

LND---La Nuova Diodati (Italian)

LSG---Louis Segond (French)

LUTHER---Martin Luther (German)

NASB---New American Standard Bible

NCV---New Century Version

NChV---New Chinese Version中文新译本

NIV---New International Version

NLT---New Living Translation

NRS---New Revised Standard

NVI---Nova Versao Internacional (Portuguese)

NVI---Nueva Version Internacional (Spanish)

OST---Bible Ostervald (French)

RSP ---(Russian)

RST ---(Russian)

RSV---Revised Standard Version

RVA---Reina-Valera Antigua (Spanish)

SBF---Studium Biblicum Franciscanum思高版圣经

SVD---Smith & Van Dyck (Arabic)

SVL---Swedish Living Bible (Swedish)

SV---Svenka 1917 (Swedish)

TEV---Today English Version

TMB---Third Millennium Bible

UV-GB---Union Version in simplified Chinese简体和合本

UV-Big5---Union Version in traditional Chinese繁体和合本

VULGATE---Biblia Sacra Vulgata (Jerome Latin)

WEB---World English Bible

WEBSTER---Noah Webster Holy Bible

WES-NT---Wesley NT

WEY-NT---Weymouth NT

YLT---Young Literal Translation
第二十四卷 (2003年) New Age and Christian Faith
by Gianni Criveller(柯毅霖)

The New Age World

1. The New Age of the Internet

My lived experiences in Hong Kong, the United States and in Italy have convinced me that New Age is significantly influential in society, in the Church, even in some traditional Catholic communities. However, I also have the impression that theologians and pastors alike underestimate the impact and significance of New Age. I believe that the Christian faithful in general, and pastoral workers and missionaries in particular, should know and understand the New Age phenomenon.

The present article is a revision of a research I conducted in 1999. In the meantime, in February 2003, the Pontifical Council for Culture and the Pontifical Council for Inter-religious Dialogue jointly have published the document: Jesus Christ the Bearer of the Water of Life; A Christian Reflection on the "New Age." I hope that the reader will find this study a good companion to the study of the Holy See's document.

New Age ideas are disseminated on the Internet,(1) and many Web pages carry references to New Age. Both New Age and the Internet seem to be interconnected by being major tools and expressions of postmodernity. New Age and the Internet are a network of networks, nets which connect infinitely different things. New Age is described by New Age writer Marilyn Ferguson in a way that strikingly resembles the description of the power of the Internet: "a network without a guide but full of force is working to bring about a radical change in this world.... This network is a union without political doctrine, without a manifesto."(2) Robert Muller, a former United Nations' vice-secretary and a prominent New Age author, has given philosophical importance to the power of networking, common to both New Age and the Internet: "Network through thought, through action, through love, through spirit. You are the centre of a network. You are free, an immensely powerful source of life... Networking is a new freedom, the new democracy, a new form of happiness."(3)

 

2. New Age's variegated world

New Age, (sometimes also called Next Age(4) and Age of Aquarius,(5) although these terms refer to something somewhat different),(6) is a loosely connected network of people, groups, activities and practices. According to its adherents, it produces beneficial results such as spiritual and personal growth, improvement in relationships, physical and psychological healing, financial success, individual and global peace, and safeguards the environment.

The content of New Age is both vast and vague, an eclectic and somewhat strange mixture of beliefs, practices and lifestyles. Elements from traditional Eastern religions such as Hinduism, Buddhism and Taoism are found together with elements from Christian and Jewish thought. But a relevant role is also played by Gnostic thought and relatively new religious bodies such as Scientology, Unity, New Thought, Religious Science and various occult cults such as Theosophy,(7) Anthroposophy,(8) Rosicrucianism(9) and spiritism.(10) Some New Age adherents accept millenarianism, astrology and pre-Christian teachings such as Celtic, Druidic, Mayan, Native American, mythology and traditional folklore. The spectrum of the practices adopted by New Age circles is also quite vast: from traditional Zen and Yoga meditation to body discipline and relaxation therapies, which include fasting, hypnosis and martial arts. Management training, enlightenment and consciousness-raising seminars, enneagram,(11) visualization and positive thinking are also popular. The latter two are based on the assumption that the mind can accomplish and create what it believes it can. New Age circles claim to experience paranormal phenomena such as astral dreaming, mental telepathy, healing, levitations, clairvoyance, automatic writing, chanting, and energy channelling. Practices of Chaldeans, Egyptians, Babylonians and other ancient peoples; horoscopes, palm reading, crystal ball gazing, water divining, pendulum, divining rod, tarot cards, tea leaves reading, divination, numerology, aura readings, iridology, palmistry, Wiccan rituals, study of animal entrails are also to be found in New Age. Unconventional stories such as UFO abductions, extraterrestrial visits, past-life regression, reincarnation and psychic healing are common subjects in New Age gatherings and literature.

In the late 1960s and early 1970s, New Age, under the name 'the Age of Aquarius,' found acceptance in the counterculture of radical movements, particularly radical environmentalism and radical feminism. In the 1980s and 1990s, New Age became a well-known international phenomenon.

Most new religions have recognized leaders, doctrines, 'inspired' scriptures, specific practices, and a very tight control over the members, while New Age has no fixed structure nor is it centrally controlled. There are no headquarters, no official doctrines, standard religious practices, or leaders in official capacities. New Age organized religious bodies such as the Church of Spiritual Healing, the Church of Ageless Wisdom, Radiant Light Interfaith Church, the Church of the Earth Nation and the Church of Truth and the New Age communes are expanding with less success than New Age itself. Centres and masters, which propagate New Age concepts and practices through seminars, channelling training and initiation courses without a distinct religious character, are much more successful.

There are many new products on the market to enhance worship, meditation and body practices: prayer mats, yapa beads, incense, clothing from natural fibres, crystals and special lights to intensify them, health foods, vitamins pills, portable massage tables, meditation goggles, subliminal tapes, herbal teas, New Age music and books.

New Age is especially popular with young, single, upwardly mobile, successful urban adults. Through them New Age ideas and practices have spread among those who are influential in society, especially in the entertainment industry, mass-media and financial world. The impact the movement is making in postmodern life is enormous. According to a survey of 1996, 20% of the American population believes in New Age.(12)

In 1997 there were more than 5000 New Age bookshops in the United States. In Hong Kong there is a least one 'New Age Shop', located in Central, and a large choice of New Age activities, such as 'holistic living' seminars, meditations, public talks, 'energy channelling' courses, etc...(13) A Hong Kong based holistic health consultant told a local magazine: "I listen to soft music that has no lyrics to unclutter my mind, and it's good for the right side of the brain... I swim to feel as though I am inside my mother's womb. We all need to learn how to let go of negativity." The article continues: "She meditates to access her inner voice and pray to a divine power, which she loosely defines as God, the universe or herself, but says is separate from religion-for strength."(14)

 

3. Two New Age streams

I believe that New Age has basically two major streams: the humanistic and the occult.

3.1 Humanistic stream

To many contemporaries, New Age practices are a way to become a better and healthier person, to be in touch with the deeper self, to interact harmoniously with others, to be renewed and reduce stress and fatigue.

New Age enhances awareness of the well being of the individual and the planet, of health and ecology. New Age promotes holistic education, meditation and psycho-training, holistic medicine and health foods.

The New Age humanistic stream sees humankind experiencing the beginning of a new spiritual awakening that will lead humanity into a new era of enlightened spiritual humanism. Writers such as Hermann Hesse, Richard Bach and Paulo Coelho represent this aspect of New Age.

3.2 Occult stream

The New Age occult stream includes a variety of exotic things: pre-Christian beliefs, channelling of healing energy, contacts with spiritual masters, mediums, initiations by gurus and masters, out-of-body experiences, astral travel, UFO abductions, astrology, tarot cards and aura reading, gemstones and crystals, shamanistic traditions, pre-Colombian oracles, magic, witchcraft (now officially recognized as a religion in some Northern countries) and sorcery.

While it is generally assumed that New Age is not an organized force, some conservative Christians claim that New Age expansion in the world follows a precise 'Plan', communicated to Alice Bailey, which consists in infiltrating governments, media, schools and churches with the purpose of establishing a New World Order, a New World Government and a New World Religion.

Moreover, a number of Evangelical and Catholic apologists such as M. Basilea Schlink,(15) Constance Cumbay,(16) Ed Decker,(17) Randall Baers,(18) Carl Raschke,(19) Douglas Groothuis,(20) John P. Newport,(21) and Cornelia R. Ferreira(22) warn that there is a dark side to New Age which includes black magic and even Satanism. Traces of Satanism can be found in the frequent mention of 'Lucifer' by New Age leader David Spangler and in the activities of the Church of Satan, founded in 1966 in San Francisco by Anton LeVey. The latter has somewhat inspired and made a cameo appearance in the horror-satanic cult-movie Rosemary's Baby (1968), directed by Roman Polansky and starring by Mia Farrow. Occultist groups claim that Adolf Hitler was acquainted with secret teachings such as that of occultist Helena Blavatsky and of Satanist Aleister Crowler.

 

4. Precursors of the New Age

The occultist stream in New Age Movement traces its modern roots to the Theosophical Society, founded in New York (1875), by Russian-born occultist Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (1831-1891). Theosophy is a pantheistic religious system. Its adherents believe that all world religions have basic common truths that transcend the differences. Blavatsky taught that people could contact higher spirit entities called Masters of Wisdom, located in the spiritual realm.

Alice A. Bailey (1880-1949), an Englishwoman who emigrated to America was one of the main figures to emerge from the Esoteric Section of the Theosophical Society. Bailey broke away from it to found the Arcane Society in 1923. She and her husband Foster Bailey established the Lucifer Publishing Company in 1922. In 1923 the name was changed to Lucis Publishing Company. She claimed to receive messages from the Tibetan Djwal Khul, a Master of Wisdom. He was an 'ascended brother', forming part of the 'Great White Brotherhood,' whose members dwell in Shambala, a mystical realm.

Some consider Blavatsky and Bailey as the founders of the New Age movement.(23) Occultist Annie Besant (1847-1937), a British feminist who was the Theosophical Society's president from 1907 to 1933, proclaimed that the coming World Teacher would be a spiritual master named Lord Maitreya.

Dr. Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925), an Austrian, was an active member of the Theosophical Society when in 1912 he broke away from it to found the Anthroposophical Society. Steiner's 'cosmic' Christology will be described below.

 
















  
















1. A characteristic of this study is the use of the Internet as one of the sources of information.

2. Marilyn Ferguson, The Aquarian Conspiracy. J.B.Tarcher, Los Angeles, 1980. Quoted by Michael Fuss, The New Age, in Towards the Jubilee of the Year 2000: New Forms of Religiosity, Challenges for Evangelization. Pontifical Missionary Union, Rome, 1999, p. 9.

3. Robert Muller, Decide to Network, in J. Beversluis (ed.), A Sourcebook for the Earth's Community of Religions. CoNexus, Grand Rapids, MI, 1995, p. 302. Quoted by Fuss, The New Age, p. 9.

4. Next Age is an expression which indicates a second stage of New Age, focused on individual happiness.

5. Astrologers believe that evolution goes through cycles corresponding to the signs of the zodiac, each lasting about 2,000 years. We are now moving from the cycle of the Pisces into that of Aquarius. The Aquarian Age will supposedly be characterized by a heightened degree of spiritual and cosmic consciousness.

6. Massimo Introvigne, New Age & Next Age. Piemme, Casale Monferrato, 2000; Gaspare Barbiellini Amidei, New Age - Next Age. Piemme, Casale Monferrato, 1998.

7. Emily B. Sellon and Renee Weber, Theosophy and the Theosophical Society. In Antoine Faivre and Jacob Needleman (eds.), Modern Esoteric Spirituality. Crossroad, New York, 1995, pp. 311-329.

8. Robert A. Mcdermott, "Rudolf Steiner and Anthroposophy," in Faivre and Needleman (eds.), Modern Esoteric Spirituality, pp. 288-310.

9. Roland Edighoffer, "Rosicrucianism: From the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century," in Faivre and Needleman (eds.), Modern Esoteric Spirituality, pp. 186-209.

10. Michael W. Homer, Lo Spiritismo. Elle Di Ci, Leumann (Torino), 1999; Antoine Faivre, Esoterismo e tradizione. Elle Di Ci, Leumann (Torino), 1999.

11. The Enneagram is an ancient method of personality typing, now adopted also in Christian circles. Sergio Ferrari - Gianni F. Trapletti, L'enneagramma: alcune domande per un dibattito, Religioni e Sette nel Mondo, No. 5, Gris, Bologna, 1996, pp. 94-118.

12. Statistic reported by George Barnia, The Index of Leading Spiritual Indicators. World Publishing, Dallas, TX, 1996; also found in Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance, religioustolerance.org.

13. The periodical, New Age News, gives information on numerous New Age activities in Hong Kong.

14. Hong Kong Magazine, April 30, 1999, p. 10.

15. M. Basilea Schlink, New Age From a Biblical Viewpoint. Evangelic Sisters of Mary, Radlett (Harts), England, n.d.

16. Constance E. Cumbey, The Hidden Dangers of the Rainbow, The New Age Movement and Our Coming Age of Barbarism. Huntington House, Shreveport, Lousiana, 1983.

17. Ed. Decker, Race Toward Judgement. The New Age Movement. saintsalive.com, 1999.

18. Randall Bears, Inside the New Age Nightmare. Walter Publishing, Merlin, OR, 1989.

19. Carl A. Raschke, Painted Black. Harper & Row, San Francisco, 1990.

20. Douglas Groothuis, Confronting the New Age. InterVarsity Press, Downers Groves, IL, 1988.

21. John P. Newport, The New Age Movement and the Biblical Worldview. Conflict and Dialogue. William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, Grand Rapids, MI/Cambridge, U.K, 1998.

22. Cornelia R. Ferreira, The New Age Movement: the Kingdom of Satan on Earth. Canisius Books, Scarborough, Ontario. 1991; "The One-World Church Emerges." Homiletic and Pastoral Review, January 1999, pp. 6-18.

23. See, for example, Robert A. Herrmann, "A Scientific Analysis of the Writings of Alice A. Bailey and their Applications," March 2001, serve.com/herrmann.

The New Age Religious Beliefs

1. New Age as the Religion of Postmodernity

There are, I believe, two religious reactions to the collapse of modernity. One is religious fundamentalism, which can be found in all major organized religions. The religious fundamentalists oppose modernity and postmodernity alike. They uphold a religious attitude, which is not only radically anti-modern, but even pre-modern. Since modernity has been defeated, fundamentalists, seem to advocate a return to pre-modernity, rejecting even basic and significant achievements such as freedom of conscience, human rights and the impartiality of the state toward religion.

The second reaction to the collapse of modernity is New Age and a number of New Religions. New Age is, in a very important sense, the religion of postmodernity.(24) New Age capitalizes on postmodern attitudes: the rejection of strong political thought, ideologies and conventional religious institutions, concerns with the environment, nuclear power, health and feminism.

The disappointment with modern secular humanism, which reduced God and faith to myths, is a major force behind the spectacular spread of New Age. The failure of secular humanism and of the modern ideologies of Communism and Nazism has created the spiritual vacuum which postmodern men and women experience.

To the postmodern lost individual, New Age proposes a 'paradigm shift', a new holistic perspective, the interconnectedness of all things and the concept of wholeness. Rational, analytical and critical knowledge, which is the basis of the scientific method, gives way to intuitive knowledge, based on non-rational experience. The use of reason does not impress New Age followers. They see dependence on logic and reason as a lack of enlightenment.

New Age adherents expand the theory that the two hemispheres of the human brain operate in two different ways. The left side dominates the logical functions while the right governs the emotional and intuitive aspects: the part of the heart, fantasy, dreams and perceptions. Western people have, supposedly, chiefly developed the left side. Techniques such as meditation, poetry, enchantments, mantras, etc., are now available to enable the development of consciousness and thus to regain balance and synchronization between the two parts of the brain.

Postmodernism and New Age share the assumption that beliefs are secondary to experience; they last as long as they are useful, are a matter of preference and not of truth, and are of equal worth. Postmodern people, isolated and lonely in this difficult and complex society, are ready to accept the idea of looking inward for solutions. In a world 'in crisis' New Age offers solutions to be found 'within yourself,' because, according to New Age adherents, 'the only way out is in.'

Since postmodernity is sometimes described as a post-Christian era, New Age seems to have the characteristics of a post-Christian religion as well. New Age, like postmodernity, rather than being a clearly defined doctrine or organization, is a 'mood', an 'atmosphere', "a metaphor for the new cultural pattern that is emerging in the post-Christian society."(25)

Many feel that traditional Christian churches are inadequate to answer these new existential quests. Instead, small groups seem to offer the individual a sense of belonging which is lost in traditional religious, cultural and political institutions. In a fast paced postmodern society, in which everything is consumed fast, New Age's intense experiences of empowerment attract people more easily than do the traditional teachings of the Christian churches, perceived as constrained by a complicated set of doctrines and a boring life.

New Age centres fulfil functions once covered by Christian communities: spiritual guidance, social gathering, fellowship, recreation, etc... Many people perhaps disillusioned, have left traditional Christian Churches and joined these centres and activities.

1.1 New Age as Postmodern Gnosticism (26)

Authors have pointed out similarities between the postmodern New Age movement and Gnosticism. The Gnostics, 'those who know,' belonged to a religious movement which flourished during the first few centuries of the Christian era.

Some New Age adherents say that Jesus was actually teaching New Age truths, and others add that the long-lost sayings of Jesus have now been rediscovered. One major source of these 'rediscovered' sayings is extracanonical literature.(27) New Age considers the Apocryphal or Gnostic Gospels(28) (2nd and 3rd centuries) counter-current literature suppressed by the early Church. Among them the Gospel of Thomas has become, with its Gnostic content, a hobby-horse of New Age.

Christian Gnostics believed that Christ's humanity was merely an illusion. Christ appeared to die, but did not really die. Christ belongs to a group of semi-divine beings (called aeon) located between God and humanity. Christian Gnostics considered matter as evil, and evil was the God of the Old Testament, creator of the material universe. The God of the New Testament, as taught by Jesus, is the God of Love. Salvation is acquired through secret knowledge, which is imparted only to the initiated. Jesus himself attained 'Christhood' through initiation: he is the 'Great Initiate.'

New Age adherents say the human Jesus attained 'Christhood' by raising his 'Christ-consciousness', 'attuning' him to the cosmic Christ. New Age adherents, like Gnostics, use Christian terminology and symbols, but the content of their teaching does not accord with traditional Christian doctrines.

 

2. New Age religious beliefs

Michael Fuss summarizes New Age religious beliefs as the sum of the interaction of four elements.(29) The first is the Judaeo- Christian tradition, from which New Age draws its terminology and to which it aims to become an alternative. The second element is science, in its anti-Western, anti-material and anti-mechanic form: the quantum science, reality as energy. The third element is the esoteric, occultist and Gnostic tradition. The fourth element comprises the theories of religious pluralism, syncretism and relativism.

These four elements constitute the ideological background of New Age religious beliefs in relation to Christian faith:

2.1 All is one

'Scientific' and religious holism (or wholism) is one of the fundamental tenets of New Age. No distinction is drawn between creation and created reality, humans and nature, God and creatures: such distinctions are illusions. New Age's God is an impersonal Ultimate Unifying Principle, a mystical Oneness, which coincides with the universe. The universe is the source of life and possesses an intelligence that guides and guards everything. God is consciousness, or an impersonal energy force. Expanding on the theory of quantum physics, reality is considered energy. According to the quantum physics that Fritjof Capra advocates, the universe is a living body, governed not by the law of matter and mechanics, but rather by relations of energy. In New Age literature, this energy goes by many names: prana, mana, force, odic force, orgone energy, holy spirit, qi, mind, healing force, reiki.(30) Energy has healing power, can be released and channelled through various forms of meditation, body therapies and magic rites. The Force is with you is the title of one New Age book. For New Age adherents, personal transformation is the process of mystically experiencing oneness with the universe.

Holism is an updated form of monism, a worldview which perceives the totality of all that exists as a reflection of an ultimate oneness. The Ultimate Principle, Higher Self, may assume several material and concrete appearances in history. These appearances in history, the 'lower self,' rather than the 'real self,' are just an illusory phenomenon that has a mere symbolic value. The religious consequence is that history in incapable of authentic revelation. All historical religious expressions have the same limited and vague value.

2.2 Everything is God

As a direct and logical consequence of the previous axiom, New Age adopts the ancient pantheistic view: everything in the universe, plants and humans, partake of the one divine essence. 'Everything is God. You are God. I am God. This microphone is God. This table is God, All is God.' Expressions like this are often heard at New Age lectures and found in numerous New Age books.

Since we are God in disguise, only ignorance (and not sin, which does not exist) keeps us from realizing our divine reality. If the whole is contained in each of its parts, then each part is the whole. "You never knew how beautiful you were, for you never really looked at who and what you are. You want to see what God looks like? Go look in a mirror, you are looking God straight in the face."(31) Judith Hampton-J.Z. Knight, in her website, provides an explanation of spiritual exercises and practical guidelines to attain the science of knowing and super-consciousness. She proclaims that "God lies within us, and there is no other redemption than for mankind to realize their Godhood."(32) She covers topics such as death and ascension, creation and evolution, reincarnation, and the purpose of existence. Again, according to New Age, a human being simply needs to discover and develop his/her divinity by expanding his/her consciousness through meditation and other spiritual practices.

2.3 Consciousness(33)

As just mentioned, the concept of consciousness is a key for understanding New Age's religious transformation. The human being has to overcome illusions and ignorance with a new consciousness. He/she must have a change of consciousness to realize that we are not finite and limited. The human being has to find his/her 'Higher Self' through consciousness expansion. The human condition is hampered by ignorance and various unfavourable cultural conditions. Evils are the result of human-produced factors and/or of the law of karma.

This perspective does not include the biblical and Christian concept of sin, which is a tragic yet real consequence of human freedom and responsibility. It also excludes the necessity of any redemption, reducing Grace and Faith to senseless doctrines. Godhood is within yourself, you have just to remove the veil of ignorance and be enlightened about your true self. Human methods, such as meditation, channelling, initiation will bring you to a superior knowledge of your superior Self.

2.4 Reincarnation and Karma (34)

According to the definition above, 'progressive spiritual evolution', embodying the doctrines of Karma and reincarnation, explains the inequalities and negativities of life, thus doing away with the Christian doctrines of sin, responsibility, redemption, hell and Heaven. New Age can partly be classified as a Western-postmodern expression of classic Hinduism. The latter was welcomed in the West especially during the 1960s, when Hindu masters went to North America and Europe to offer their teachings, and many Westerners went to India in search of the spiritual.

2.5 Channelling and spirit contact

Channelling, which means contact with entities, including angels,(35) allowing oneself to become a 'channeller' and a messenger of spiritual messages, and spirit contact are activities that have had huge success in the New Age movement. Spirit contact is a renewed and developed form of contact with the spirit of the dead, practised in the last 150 years by the occultist societies. The messages are from loving entities, which help humanity to reach perfection through a spiritual evolution. The medium J. Z. Knight (Judith Hampton), claims to be the channeller of Ramtha, a 'Sovereign Entity' who lived on earth over 35,000 years ago, who has ascended to a higher level of consciousness to teach humankind how to rediscover the 'God who lives within you.'(36) In the practise of Reiki, the initiated individuals are said to become channels of Reiki energy.

2.6 New Age and Religious Pluralism

According to the pluralism of New Age, the enlightened ones of all the great religions, Jesus, Buddha, Krishna, Laozi, Mohamed, Zoroaster etc... have taught an experience of the same oneness. There are many paths to the one truth, many methods to become one with the One. All the differences are superficial and external. Truth can be revealed in diverse ways and through diverse agents. No individual, collective, or church possesses a monopoly on the truth, an attitude shared with postmodern thought. Paulo Coelho in one of his novel writes:

The Buddhists were right, the Hindus were right, the Muslims were right, and so were the Jews. Whenever someone follows the path to faith, sincerely follows it, he or she is able to unite with God and to perform miracles. But it wasn't enough simply to know that you have to make a choice. I chose the Catholic Church because I was raised in it, and my childhood has been impregnated with its mysteries. If I had been born Jewish, I would have chosen Judaism. God is the same, even though He has a thousand names; it is up to us to select a name for Him.(37)

We will return to this point.

2.7 The glorious New Age future

From astrology the New Age derives cosmic optimism, a principle based on evolution and on eventually reaching the Omega Point. We are at the dawn of a new era, characterized by a 'collective enlightenment of human consciousness'. Some foresee the appearance of a 'Greater Christ', a New Messiah, a New Avatar,(38) who will take humanity to the universal experience of cosmic harmony and bliss.

2.8 The cult of Gaia

Women and feminism hold a prominent position in New Age where it is common to refer to God as 'Mother' or 'She.' Some radical New Age adherents take up the ancient belief that equates 'woman' with 'nature,' resuming interest in female gods of pre-Christian cultures such as Iris, Astarte, Demeter, Hera and especially Gaia. The radical vanguard of the New Age feminist movement, dissatisfied with the masculine character of the Biblical God, advocates the introduction of the cult of the goddess Gaia, the Greek 'Mother Earth.'

Gaia is also the name of a scientific hypothesis formulated by James Lovelock. According to the Gaia hypothesis, to put it simply, all living matter on the earth is believed to be a single living organism, and humanity is considered the nervous system of the living earth.(39)

2.9 The Great Mother

There is a Catholic version of the cult of the 'Great Mother' proposed by Paulo Coelho, perhaps echoing a hypothesis of Brazilian theologian Leonardo Boff.(40) Coelho offers for consideration the 'Virgin' Mary as the feminine face of God. She is the feminine incarnation of God, as Jesus is the masculine incarnation of God.

"She is the cosmic bride, Earth, which opens to the heavens and allows itself to be fertilized. ... She allowed God to come down to earth, and She was transformed into the Great Mother. She is the feminine face of God. She has her own divinity.... This woman, the Goddess, the Virgin, Mary, the Shechinah, the Great Mother, Isis, Sofia, slave and mistress, is present in every religion on the face of the earth. She has been forgotten, prohibited, and disguised, but her cult has continued from millennium to millennium and continues to survive today.... In every religion and in every tradition, she manifests Herself in one form or another. Since I am Catholic, I perceive Her as the Virgin Mary.(41)

Coelho goes as far as proposing "a Holy Trinity that includes a woman. The Trinity of the Holy Spirit, the mother and the Son."(42) "How wonderful that God may be a woman, I said to myself, as the others continued to chant. If that's true, then it was certainly God's feminine face that taught us how to love."(43)












  








24. For postmodernity see my articles, The Postmodern Condition and the Enduring Good News of the Gospel. Theological Annual, 1999, pp. 57-102; Mission in Postmodern Times," in Philip L. Wickeri, (ed.), The People of God Among All God's Peoples: Frontiers in Christian Mission. Christian Conference of Asia & The Council for World Mission, Hong Kong-London 2000, pp. 183-203. See also Aldo Natale Terrin, New Age, La religiosita del Postmoderno. Dehoniane, Bologna, 1992.

25. Fuss, The New Age, p. 3.

26. Andrea Porcarelli, Il New Age: una forma di Gnosticismo moderno, Religioni e Sette nel Mondo, No. 6, 1996, pp. 51-77.

27. Some of these texts were discovered in 1945 at Nag Hammadi, a locality in Upper Egypt. Nag Hammadi's writings are fourth-century papyrus manuscripts that formed part of a Gnostic library. Among the writings are the Apocryphon of John, the Gospel of Philip, the Gospel of Thomas, the Apocalypse of Paul, and the Gospel of Mary.

28. Bentley Layton (ed.), The Gnostic Scriptures. Garden City, Doubleday & Co., 1987.

29. Fuss, The New Age, p. 4.

30. On Reiki, see: Mauro Roventi Beccari, "Rei-ki, energia che guarisce," Religione e Sette nel mondo, No. 6, pp. 78-114.

31. Transchanneller J. Z. Knight, born Judith Darlene Hampton. See her websites: seekersway.org; ramtha.com.

32.Ibid.

33. Jean Vernette, Dai cambiamenti nella coscienza e nel cervello al risveglio interiore, Religione e Sette nel mondo, No.5, pp. 57-70.

34. Julien Ries, New Age e Reincarnazione, Religioni e Sette nel mondo, No. 5, pp. 45-56.

35. Daniel Gagnon, Gli Angeli e il New Age, Religioni e Sette nel mondo, No. 6, pp. 115-131.

36.See seekersway.org; ramtha.com.

37. Paulo Coelho, By the River Piedra I Sat Down and Wept. HarperCollins, London, 1996, p. 90.

38. An Avatar descends into human form from above as a manifestation of divinity and reveals divine truth to people.

39. David L. Brown, A Brief Dictionary of New Age Terminology, logosresourcepages.org.

40. "The Holy Spirit has made Her (Mary) His Temple, Sanctuary and Tabernacle in so real and genuine a way that She is to be regarded as hypostatically united to the Third Person of the Blessed Trinity." Leonardo Boff, The Maternal Face of God. The Feminine and Its Religious Expressions. Harper & Row, San Francisco, 1987, p. 93.

41. Coelho, By The River Piedra, pp. 66-67, 69.

42. Ibid. p.148.

43.Ibid. p.118.

The New Age Jesus Christ

1. Jesus Goes East(44)

Shirley MacLaine in Out on a Limbo recounts a conversation with a friend,

You know that nothing is recorded in the Bible about Christ from the time he was about twelve until he began to really teach at about thirty years old. Those eighteen missing years were spent travelling in and around India and Tibet and Persia and the Near East.(45)

That Jesus travelled East has become one of the 'major secrets' revealed by the New Age adherents. All started with The Unknown Life of Christ, a book published in 1894 by Nicolas Notovitch, a Russian war correspondent, who claimed that in 1887 he had visited the Lama Monastery of Himis (Northern India). There he learned about a Grand Lama named Issa (the Tibetan form of Jesus). A chronicle of the life of Issa, written down in scrolls located at the monastery, were read to and translated for the Russian traveller. Notovitch learned that Jesus had wandered to India and to Tibet as a young man studying the laws of the Buddha. Eventually the priests of Brahma taught him to read and understand the Vedas, to cure, to teach, to preach and to drive out evil spirits. Issa-Jesus had become a perfect expositor of the sacred writings. After long travels in various countries, Issa-Jesus returned to Israel and preached what he had learned to all.

As early as 1894, although partial to oriental doctrines rather than to Christianity, Orientalist Max Muller of Oxford University rebuked Notovitch for his fantastic tale in the scholarly review The Nineteenth Century.(46)

J. Archibald Douglas, Professor at Government College in Agra, India, who visited the monastery of Himis in 1895, also denied the whole story.(47)

Nevertheless Notovitch's book, under the title of The Life of Saint Issa, was republished in New York in 1926. Since then other authors, such as Edgar J. Goodspeed(48) and Per Beskow,(49) Joseph Gaer,(50) Philip J. Swihart,(51) Anne Read,(52) Tal Brooke,(53) and the above-mentioned Douglas Groothuis and Ron Rhodes, have rejected Notovitch's account. But some members of occultist societies, such as Elizabeth Clare Prophet,(54) Nicholas Roerich,(55) Holger Kersten,(56) David Spangler,(57) Janet Block(58) and others have published several books perpetuating the tale. Elizabeth Clare Prophet's book, The Lost Years of Jesus, was made into a movie in 2001.

 

2. The Akashic Records

A major source for the 'Jesus goes East' stories is The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ,59 written by occultist Levi Dowling (1844-1911). This 'gospel' is a transcription from the Book of God's Remembrances, known as the Akashic Records. 'Akasha' is, according to the occultists, a spiritual field that surrounds earth, in which every person's word, thought or act is inscribed in imperishable records, known as Akashic Records. Levi's gospel developed the tale of the travels of Jesus: after having travelled throughout India and Tibet, Jesus arrived in Egypt, where he passed through seven degrees of initiation until he attained Christhood. Other occultists, such as Edgar Cayce (1877-1945), followed in the same line of the Akashic Records, which they claim to have read while in a trance.

It is obvious that 'Jesus goes East' stories and the Akashic Records lack any rational, scientific and historical evidence. These writings cannot be compared to the witness of Jesus rendered by New Testament. Any critical study would exclude the possibility of such travels.

3. The New Age Christ (60)

New Age's own reinterpretations of the person and work of Christ are rooted in esoteric thought from the end of the 19th century. American metaphysicist Phineas Parkhurst Quimby (1802-1866)(61) has played a significant role in New Age Christology. He advocated that the source of physical healing lies in the mind. Physical diseases are caused by wrong thinking or false beliefs, which can be corrected by 'the Christ.' Clearly distinguishing Jesus from the Christ, Quimby credited Jesus with discovering the 'Truth,' elevating him above any man who has ever lived. Quimby's thought greatly influenced Mary Baker Eddy, the founder of Christian Science.

Quimby also inspired a number of inclusive metaphysical groups that emerged in the 1890s. These were generally described as 'New Thought.' These groups see the Christ is an impersonal Divine Nature or Principle. They believed that Jesus had embodied the Christ-principle, more than any other human had before, fully realizing his Christ-nature. Jesus was not a saviour; he was merely a 'way-shower.'

The success and dissemination of New Thought's Christology has given rise to various offshoots such as the Unity School of Christianity, founded by Charles and Myrtle Fillmore (1845-1931 and 1854-1948) in 1891; and The United Church of Religious Science, founded by Ernest Holmes (1887-1960) in 1926.

Swinburne Clymer (1878-1966), a Rosicrucian,(62) anticipated the New Age pantheistic view of enlightenment. According to Clymer, author of numerous books on Christ, each life is a spark, a germ of the Divine Nature. This spark is the potential Christ within.

Helena Blavatsky thought that the Supreme World Teacher, also known as 'the Christ,' enters the body of a disciple to guide the spiritual evolution of humanity.(63) Each 'incarnation' of 'Christ' reveals something more about God. The five incarnations of Christ were Buddha (in India), Hermes (in Egypt), Zoroaster (in Persia), Orpheus (in Greece), and Jesus. Along the same lines, Annie Besant said that the Christ needed a human form, and did not die on the cross. Salvation in fact is obtained by spiritual evolution, which comes through successive incarnations, which allow every person potentially to become 'Christ.'(64)

Rudolf Steiner, in polemics with Besant, maintained that the death of Jesus has something to do with human salvation. Steiner's Christology is based on Akashic Records, which according to Steiner, says that the incarnation of the Christ in Jesus was the central event of human evolution, and restored humanity to the spiritual realm. The blood that flowed from the wounds of Jesus Christ at the crucifixion flowed into the earth and passed through a process of 'etherisation'. At the moment of his death, the Christ left Jesus' body and 'incarnated' into the etheric earth, and now seeks to 'mass incarnate' into all humanity, for the sake of its redemption. Christ belongs now to the whole earth and can enter all human souls, regardless of nation and religion: this is his true 'second coming.'(65)

For David Spangler, Christ is "a cosmic Christ, a universal Christ, a New Age Christ."(66) He is a cosmic principle, which utilized Jesus' body, "a spiritual presence whose quality infuses and appears in various ways in all the religions and philosophies that uplift humanity."(67) Through the resurrection, the out-flowing of Christ-energies from the etheric earth, and ascension of Christ-consciousness in humanity, the cosmic Christ became saviour since he entered into the process of evolution.

Alice Bailey, differently from Steiner, argued that the 'second coming' referred to the Christ coming in a single Avatar, not in all humanity. Christ will come again in a way that will create no religious, social or ideological divisions. He is 'the World Teacher and not a Christian teacher.'(68)

Guy and Edna Ballard were Theosophists who opted to believe in the 'Ascended Masters,' a reference to those masters who have supposedly reached the highest level of spiritual consciousness, and have become guides of the spiritual evolution of humankind. Jesus is one of these 'Ascended Masters.'(69)

In 1958 Mark Prophet (1918-1973) founded the Church Universal and Triumphant, now headed by his widow, Elizabeth Clare Prophet. Their beliefs include revelations from the 'Ascended Masters,' who guide the spiritual evolution of humanity. They reject the doctrine of Redemption through the death of Jesus. Rather Jesus attained Christhood as did other 'Ascended Masters.(70)

Esoteric and New Age writer Lola Davis affirms that the New Age Christ resides on a different plane of consciousness. 'Christ' is the name given to the leader of the Spiritual Hierarchy of Masters.(71)

New Age's authors M.S. Princess and Helen Schucman (1909-1981) supported the theory of the inherence of Christ in humans and the importance of the rediscovery of one's Christhood.(72)

The interpretation of Christ proposed by New Age adherents Peter Liefhebber and Hilton Hotema goes much further. In the discourse on Christ, they introduced the mystic-legendary figures of Appolonius and Maitreya, which have embodied the Christ principle, and will personify Christ in his second coming.(73)

Famous New Age writer Benjamin Cr╴e expands the theories about Maitreya in a most unique fashion. Maitreya, originally a Buddha figure, is believed to be the one expected by all religions. Christians expect him as Christ in his imminent return; Jews await him as the Messiah; Hindus look for the coming of Krishna; Buddhists expect him as Maitreya Buddha; and Muslims anticipate the Imam Mahdi or Messiah. He is everything to everyone.(74)

In conclusion, in New Age Christology the distinction between Jesus (a mere human vessel) and the Christ (a divine, cosmic and impersonal entity) is fundamental. Jesus embodied the Christ-principle, fully realizing his Christ-nature.












  










45. Shirley MacLaine, Out on a Limb. Bantam Books, New York, 1984, pp. 233-234.

46. Max Muller, The Alleged Sojourn of Christ in India, The Nineteenth Century, No. 36, October, 1894, pp. 515 ff. Among other arguments, Muller asserted that an old document, like the one allegedly found, would have been included in the Kandjur and Tandjur catalogues in which all Tibetan literature is listed. Muller also cites a visitor to the monastery of Himis in 1894, who inquired about Notovitch, and said that no Russian had ever visited there, and the whole story was nothing but a fabrication.

47. J. Archibald Douglas, The Chief Lama of Himis on the Alleged Unknown Life of Christ, The Nineteenth Century, No. 39, April 1896, pp. 667-678.

48. Edgar J. Goodspeed, Strange New Gospels. The University Of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1931; Modern Apocrypha. Beacon Press, Boston, 1956.

49. Per Beskow, Strange Tales About Jesus: A Survey of Unfamiliar Gospels. Fortress, Philadelphia, 1983.

50. Joseph Gaer, The Lore of the New Testament. Little Brown and Co., Boston, 1952.

51. Philip J. Swihart, Reincarnation, Edgar Cayce, and the Bible. InterVarsity Press, Downers Groves, IL, 1978.

52. Anne Read, Edgar Cayce: On Jesus and His Church. Warner Books, New York, 1970.

53. Tal Brooke, When the World Will Be as One. Harvest House Publishers, Eugene, OR, 1989.

54. Elizabeth Clare Prophet, The Lost Years of Jesus. Summit University Press, Livingston, MT, 1984; Mark L. Prophet and Elizabeth Clare Prophet, The Lost Teachings of Jesus. Summit University Press, Livingston, MT, 1988.

55. Nicholas Roerich, Himalaya. Brentano's, New York, 1926.

56. Holger Kersten, Jesus Lived in India. Element Book, Longmead, England, 1986.

57. David Spangler, The Laws of Manifestation. Findhorn Publications, Forres, Scotland, 1983; Reflections on the Christ. Findhorn Publications, Forres, Scotland, 1981.

58. Janet Block, The Jesus Mystery: Of Lost Years and Unknown Travels. Aura Books, Los Angeles, 1980.

59. Levi Dowling, The Aquarian Gospel of Jesus the Christ. L. N. Fowler & Co., London 1947, (first edition in 1911).

60. For the summary of the various authors of New Age Christology, I am indebted to Ron Rhodes The Christ of the New Age Movement. See also Alessandro Olivieri Pennesi, Il Cristo del New Age. Indagine Critica. Libreria Editrice Vaticana, Vatican City, 1999. On the New Age Christ, besides the texts mentioned above, see Elizabeth Sand Turner, What Unity Teaches. Unity School of Christianity, Lee's Summit, MO, n.d.; Ernest Holmes, What Religious Science Teaches. Science of Mind Publications, Los Angeles, 1975.

61. Phineas P. Quimby, The Quimby Manuscripts, (ed. by Horatio W. Dresser), University Books, New Hyde Park, NY, 1961.

62. Rosicrucianism is a mystical cult that supposedly originated in the 'Mystery Schools' of Egypt.

63. Helena P. Blavatsky, The Secret Doctrine. Theosophical Publishing House, Wheaton, IL, 1966.

64. Annie Besant, Esoteric Christianity. Theosophical Publishing House, Wheaton, IL, 1953.

65. Rudolf Steiner, The Reappearance of the Christ in the Etheric. Anthroposophic Press, Spring Valley, NY, 1983; Jesus and Christ. Anthroposophic Press, Spring Valley, NY, 1976; The Four Sacrifices of Christ. Anthroposophic Press, Spring Valley, NY, 1944.

66. Spangler, Reflections on the Christ, p. 107.

67. David Spangler, Conversations with John. Lorian Press, Middleton, WI, 1983, p. 5. See also David Spangler, Revelation: The Birth of a New Age. Lorian Press, Middleton, WI, 1976.

68. Alice Bailey, The Reappearance of the Christ. Lucis Publishing Co., New York, 1979; The Externalization of the Hierarchy. Lucis Publishing Co., New York, 1957.

69. G. W. and Donald Ballard, Purpose of the Ascended Masters' "I AM" Activity. Saint Germain Press, Chicago, 1942.

70. Mark and Elizabeth Prophet, Climb the Highest Mountain. Summit University Press, Los Angeles, 1974.

71. Lola Davis's book entitled Toward a World Religion for a New Age is often mentioned in New Age Web pages, but I have not found any reference about the place or year of publication.

72. M.S. Princess, Step By Step We Climb. Quoted in The Christ of The New Age, in Let Us Reason, a Christian apologetic web page, www.letusreason.org/NAM17.htm; Helen Schucman, A Course in Miracles. Foundation for Inner Peace, Temecula, CA, 1976.

73. Peter Liefhebber, Jesus of Nazareth and Maitreya the Christ. Lucis Publishing Co, n.d.; Hilton Hotema, Mystery Man, Snowbowl, Missoula, MT, n.d.

74. Benjamin Creme, The Reappearance of the Christ and the Masters of Wisdom. Tara Center, North Hollywood, CA, 1980.

A Christian response to New Age

1. The New Age Jesus

Several Christian authors have already provided a detailed rebuttal of the New Age interpretation of Jesus Christ, from the story of "Jesus Goes East," to the sophisticated esoteric elaboration of Steiner, or to the absurd fantasies of Creme.(75) Here I will not critique all those theories: not only would it take up too much space, but it also seems quite unnecessary. What I consider illogical is the general "theological" approach to Christ, the disregard of the New Testament, and the unmotivated rejection of Christian tradition. One is also puzzled by the lack of concern for history, objectivity, rationality, science, the critical method and verifiability. In the esoteric interpretation of Christ nothing is stated by reasoning; therefore, it is impossible to apply basic concepts as right or wrong, because evidence presupposes rationality and objectivity. It is impossible to accept an esoteric system of interpreting the Bible, which seeks hidden, inner meanings in Bible verses, that ignores historicity and rejects standard hermeneutics. The Jesus of historical records is abandoned in favour of the Jesus of the Gnostic Gospels, or even of the esoteric Akashic Records and other quixotic, mystic documents. But the Gospels are still the only documents on Jesus able to stand up to critical and scientific analysis. The very same appropriation by New Age authors and their precursors, of the term Christ, while ignoring its original and specific biblical meaning, cannot be justified.

We have seen how New Age, though it has developed outside the mainstream of Christian theology, has often employed Christian terminology and concepts in a confused and confusing fashion. The overlapping of terminology and concepts between New Age and Christian theology occurs over and over again in the field of theological environmentalism, feminism, religious pluralism and inter-religious dialogue. Christian theologians should continue to employ concepts such as Mother Earth, the feminine in God, the spiritual treasures of religions, the Cosmic Christ etc., without being classified as New Age adherents. But they should be aware that there is contamination of the terminologies of the two camps, and consequently it might not be too difficult to pass from Christian to New Age interpretation.

 

2. The Jesus Avatar

In the history of mission in China, learned friends used to ask the missionaries questions which seem to anticipate the difficulties about the acceptance of the singularity of Jesus Christ. In Late Ming China, a friend of Jesuit Giulio Aleni (1582-1649), Zhou Xiaolian, made the following proposal: to unite the religion of the Lord of Heaven with the teaching of Buddha and Laozi.(76)

Another of Aleni's learned friends, Ye Xianggao, affirmed that Jesus might well be "only a great saint born in the world, the same as Kong of Confucianism, Lao of Taoism, and Sakyamuni of Buddhism, etc... and he might not be the true Lord of Heaven."(77) On another occasion, the same Ye Xianggao wrote: "The King of the upper region did incarnate several times here in the East in the person of Yao, Xun, Confucius, and many others... Therefore, he might just as well have incarnated in Europe, as the Fathers of the Society say he did in the person of Jesus. From this it is quite clearly that to the Chinese, Christ in Europe is no more than Confucius, or any other wise man in China."(78)

The syncretistic interpretating proposed by Zhou Xiaolin and Ye Xianggao of Jesus as one of the many possible avatars, anticipates the contemporary debate on religious pluralism and the uniqueness of Jesus Christ.

 

3. Religious pluralism in accordance with the New Age

The theology of Matthew Fox(79) has a marked mystical orientation, which leads him to overlook the historical Jesus and refocus attention on a quest for the cosmic Christ, "the pattern that connects."(80) Fox calls for a "deep ecumenism," by which he means a genuine coming together of all persons of all religions at a mystical level, following the Cosmic Christ, the forerunner. While Fox affirms that he does not belong to New Age, which he considers something for rich people, his description of the Cosmic Christ overlaps with New Age's Cosmic Christ.

Catholic priest Diarmuid  author of Quantum Theology, invites his readers to do theology in the following fashion: "Bring all the reserves you can of imagination, intuition, creativity, and your capacity to marvel. And please bring along your wild (wo)man, your deep feminine part, your hurt child, your wounded parent, and, above all, your flamboyant artist."(81)

theology startlingly overlaps the New Age religious programme. In  book God and the divine (terms used indifferently and sparingly because these are just human constructs) are described as creative energy. Each religion is a particular crystallization of divine revelation. Revelation is an ongoing process that cannot be subsumed under any religion. The doctrine of the Trinity is a human attempt to describe God's fundamental relational nature. Sin is a destructive collusion between people and systems. The greatest sin is the assumption that humans are the ultimate form of life under God and entitled to lord it over the rest of creation. We live in a world without beginning and end. Our dead ones are all around us, living within a different plane of existence. Resurrection and reincarnation are not facts, but mental/spiritual constructs.(82)  description of the Cosmic Christ could wholeheartedly be endorsed by New Age's propagators. "Christian theologians tend to argue that the Cosmic Christ makes no sense apart from the particular, historical Jesus.... This is where quantum theology differs radically. It considers the Cosmic Christ ... to be the originating mystery from which we devise all our divine personages and images. All the god-figures of the different religions, including Christianity, emanate from this cosmic originating source."(83)

A clear cut distinction between the historical Jesus and the Cosmic Christ has been proposed by Raimundo Panikkar. After holding an inclusive approach to religious pluralism, in line with Karl Rahner's theory of the "anonymous Christians,"(84) Panikkar has progressively affirmed the non-correspondence between Jesus and Christ. "Christ" becomes a super-name, which includes many names, including the one of Jesus. The Christian can rightly continue to affirm that Jesus is the Christ, but not that the Christ is Jesus, or that only Jesus is the Christ. Panikkar affirms that, with such an interpretation, he wants to go beyond the Western way of understanding the Christ.(85)

 

4. The Cosmic Christ

The depersonalisation of Jesus Christ through expressions such as "Christ Consciousness" or an impersonal Cosmic Christ is the most serious problem I encounter in New Age Christology. Rather then being the Son of God incarnate, "the only name under heaven given" (Act 4:12), as Christians profess, Jesus is one of the many possible Avatars, one of many other Christs.

As mentioned above, the theology of religious pluralism also adopts the category of Cosmic Christ. Exponents of the theology of religious pluralism affirm the need of replacing traditional Christ-centred theology with God-centred or Salvation-centred theology, proposing a clear-cut distinction between the Jesus of History and the Cosmic Christ. The first is the founder of Christianity and, insofar as he was a historic personage, is just one of the many religious prophets, while the second is the ultimate fulfilment of religions, of humanity and of the cosmos. Inter-religious dialogue requires, according to some, that all religions give up the claim of being the only true religion. In particular Christianity should give up the presumption that Jesus is the only incarnation of God.

But such an interpretation of religious pluralism might lead to contamination, assimilation, relativism, lack of differentiation and syncretism. In this way there is "no respect for a genuine pluralism of co-existence between different religions."(86)

Such an interpretation of the Cosmic Christ appears to me to be a dramatic departure from the Christology of the New Testament. The Cosmic Christ is a legitimate and necessary theological category. However, this category cannot be isolated from the whole of the mystery of Christ and given meanings which depart from the content of the New Testament and the Christian faith.

My understanding is that the universality of Christian revelation must be seen within a salvation-history perspective. The doctrine of creation reveals that the creative act is God's self-communication, i.e. revelation. Since the creative act constitutes history, the events of human history reflect such a revelation. All nations, therefore, somehow, have received from God. Moreover through his Incarnation, Jesus Christ has united himself to the world and to every person in the world (John Paul II, Redemptoris Hominis, n. 37); therefore, human history is indeed the place of God's revelation. The events of Incarnation, Passion and Resurrection express the irreducible historical and concrete character of Christianity. The meaning of these events is also universal. It transcends cultures and nations in order to embrace them all. As we exist only as persons in history, our experience of God is historical. The same universal revelation can only exist as told in a specific and singular historical event, which must necessarily have a meaning which is definitive and universal. This event is Jesus Christ, an event that cannot be overlooked or cancelled. God, the invisible One, is known only through what is visible, historical, and concrete. The "concreteness" of Christian revelation cannot be done away with.

Furthermore, the personal character of God as believed by Christians disappears in New Age thought. The Trinitarian nature of the Christian God fades with the cancellation of distinction and otherness. The affirmation that God exists only within humanity self is the denial of the possibility of communication and dialogue between God and humanity. The consequences for Christian faith are quite serious: New Age, somewhat quietly but effectively abolishes not only the concept of history and relationship with God, but also the doctrines of Creation, of Providence and of Redemption.(87)












  










75. James W. Sire, Scripture Twisting. InterVarsity Press, Downers Groves, IL, 1980; Newport, The New Age Movement; Van Vander Lugt, Kurt De Haan, What's the Appeal of the New Age Movement? RBC Ministries, Grand Rapids, MI, 1990; Groothuis, Confronting the New Age; Goodspeed, Strange New Gospels; Romarheim, The Aquarian Christ; Beskow, Strange Tales About Jesus; Rhodes, The Counterfeit Christ.

76. Gianni Criveller, Dialogues on Jesus in China (13): Dialogue versus Syncretism, Tripod, No. 129, 2003, pp. 41-44.

77. Gianni Criveller, Dialogues on Jesus in China (11): Jesus, Buddha and Religious Pluralism, Tripod, No. 127, 2003, pp. 50-53.

78. Gianni Criveller, Dialogues on Jesus in China (10): Is Jesus a Sage like Confucius and Mencius and Other Chinese Sages? Tripod, No. 126, 2003, pp. 57-60.

79. Matthew Fox, The Coming of the Cosmic Christ. Harper & Row, San Francisco, 1988.

80. Ibid. pp.133-135.

81.Diarmuid O' Murch? Quantum Theology, Spiritual Implication of the New Physics. Crossroad, New York, 1998, p. 5.

82. Ibid. pp. 197-203.

83. Ibid. p. 178.

84. Raimon Panikkar, The Hidden Christ of Hinduism. (revised edition), Orbis Books, Maryknoll, NY, 1981.

85. Prologue of a later edition of his The Hidden Christ of Hinduism; I refer to the Italian edition, Il Cristo sconosciuto dell'Induismo. Vita e Pensiero, Milano 1976, pp. 19-32. In the prologue Panikkar affirms that he mercilessly criticizes the original version of his book.

86. Fuss, The New Age, p. 5.

87. See: Carlo Maccari, La 'mistica cosmica' del New Age, Religioni e Sette nel mondo, No. 6, pp. 16-36. The following Christian authours propose a dialogue with New Age: George A. Maloney, S. J., Mysticism and the New Age. Christic Consciousness in the New Creation. Alba House, New York, 1991; Paul Poupard, Editoriale, Religioni e Sette nel mondo, No. 5, pp. 7-13; Paul Poupard, Editoriale, Religioni e Sette nel mondo, No. 6, pp. 7-14; Carlo Maccari, La New Age di fronte alla fede cristiana. Elle Di Ci, Leumann (Torino), 1994; Godfried Danneels, Le Christ ou le Verseau. Malines-Bruxelles, 1990; Ronald Quillo, Companions in Consciouness: the Bible and the New Age Movement. Liguori Publications, Liguori, MO, 1994; Catholic Answers to Questions About the New Age Movement. Liguori Publications, Liguori, MO, 1995; Richard Bergeron, Il New Age nel Quebec, Religioni e Sette nel mondo, No. 6, pp. 71-93.

New Age missionary challenges

New Age has profound ramifications in the mentality and behaviour of many contemporaries all around the world, including people born in traditional Christian communities, although some of them might actually not consciously adhere to New Age as such.

New Age has touched you. You've heard its ideas, listened to its music, viewed its artwork, watched its superstars, read its literature and bought its products. You may even have participated in its therapies, shared in its rituals and embraced its philosophies, all without knowing them as New Age.(88)

Furthermore, the phenomenon of globalisation favours a universal impact of New Age, which constitutes a great challenge particularly in Asia, which is spontaneously inclined to religious pluralism. In Asia in fact, people can readily accept a number of New Age ideas because they are partially consistent with and comparable to elements found in ancient religious doctrines, such as Hinduism, Taoism and Buddhism.

If people are espousing New Age ideas and shopping around for various religious option, because they are starving for something to fill their spiritual needs, one might admit that, humanly speaking, New Age provides some more suitable answer to the postmodern condition. In times of muddled thinking, when different beliefs are a matter of preference and not of truth, the proclamation of Jesus appears to many to make no sense. They see it as an outdated, arrogant and finally ignorant attitude, since the truth is inside oneself and needs only to be unveiled. Evangelizing in such a context is indeed a difficult challenge, and this may be one of the reasons that many, even missionaries, have given up the direct preaching of Christ.

In the last 30 years or so, particularly in the Catholic Church, inculturation and inter-religious dialogue have been considered the major challenges of doing mission in Asia. I would add that the person of Jesus, the Christological question, is an even greater challenge in our time.

New Age challenges Christians, but they should not be discouraged by the apparent success of this movement. Early Christianity found itself in a somewhat analogous situation in the early centuries. Gnosticism, enigmatic religions, various occult cults, rituals and teachings, a number of heresies that reduced either the humanity of Jesus Christ to a farce or the divinity of Christ to an excess of consciousness, dramatically challenged Christian faith. As mentioned above, in Late Ming China, Jesuit missionaries faced similar questions.

Just as at the beginning of the Christian era, faith in Jesus Christ, as the unique event of God become human, was a scandal and foolishness, so it is in the postmodern era. Jesus' question: 'Who do you say that I am?' continues to be a fundamental challenge to human beings, even at the beginning of the third millennium.

The early Church responded by formulating daring Christological definitions and with the genuine witness of faith, as illustrated by large numbers of generous missionaries and courageous martyrs. Christ's disciples are called today to bear the same witness as were the early Christians, "to be the salt of the earth and the light of the world.?Following Jesus may not result in daily exiting experiences, in alteration of consciousness. For the Christian, the mind, rather than altered, is transformed by God's grace. Christian faith is not simply a religious answer to the aspirations of the human mind. It is not (only and primarily) an answer to human needs. Human issues are not prior and above the gratuitous grace of God, who loved us and came to us on his own initiative and in a way contrary to human expectations.

Many people are open to New Age teaching because they are on a quest for meaning, fulfilment, spiritual experiences, stillness, and inner peace. There is a need to respond positively to this search, to rediscover the rich and often unknown tradition of Christian prayer, meditation, spiritual guidance and mysticism. The question of God and the experience of God should become central in the mission of the Church. Many postmodern people perceive the vastness of time and space as cold and impersonal, as if we are alone in the world and living an absurd existence. The New Age quest of spirit highlights the need for reassurance that death is not the complete extinction of life. Christians and missionaries are challenged to propose the oftenobsolete teaching of Christian hope in eternal life.

New Age has an accentuated individualistic character. To a certain extent, it is the religion of the successful, the glamorous and the rich. Its practice can cost a significant amount of money. Christians should rediscover the positive lesson of the Theology of Liberation, and adhere to the gospel of the Beatitudes and bring about a non-bourgeois approach to religion, especially in the so-called economically advanced countries. The church exists for the same mission of Jesus: the mission of evangelization of the poor.

New Age, which has won the sympathy of a lot of women, has a strong feminist outlook. Such a perspective contrasts with the Church's image of an all-male dominated society, which she projects especially in her hierarchy. In fact many sectors of the Church are still afflicted with a patriarchal mentality. The problem of the role of women in the Church cannot be reduced to a no to their ordination to the priesthood. The participation of women in the life and in the leadership of the church is too important and far from being resolved. Moreover, the preaching and the catechesis of the Church have to go beyond the traditional patriarchal and masculine image of God. The New Age feminist outlook genuinely and positively challenges the Church to move beyond the present masculine outlook and become, in all its aspects, a more gender inclusive community.

A personal, sincere witness, as Paul VI noted, is highly valued by contemporary postmodern people. Experience seems to have become the only "authoritative"authority in today's religious world. Christ's disciples and missionaries should propose a discourse on Christian faith which is rational, but which goes beyond rationality. They are called to experience fulfilment, purpose and joy through a personal relationship with Jesus. The communication and sharing of such a life inserted into the mystery of Christ would prove, by experience, that Jesus is neither substitutable nor replaceable.



88. Russell Chandler, Understanding the New Age. Word Publishing, Milton Keynes, (England), 1989, p. 19.

Addendum

1. New Age Books

New Age has its authors. The document of the Holy See (2003) mentions 13 books: William Bloom, The New Age. An Anthology of Essential Writings, London, Rider, 1991; two books by Fritjof Capra, who advocates a New Age science: The Tao of Physics: An Exploration of the Parallels between Modern Physics and Eastern Mysticism, Berkeley, Shambhala, 1975; and The Turning Point: Science, Society and the Rising Culture, Toronto (Bantam) 1983. The following authors developed the religious dimension of New Age: Benjamin Cremee, The Reappearance of Christ and the Masters of Wisdom, London, Tara Press, 1979; the very influential book by Marilyn Ferguson, The Aquarian Conspiracy. Personal and Social Transformation in Our Time, Los Angeles (Tarcher) 1980; Chris Griscom, Ecstasy is a New Frequency: Teachings of the Light Institute, New York, Simon & Schuster, 1987; Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1970; five books by David Spangler: The New Age Vision, Forres, Findhorn Publications, 1980; Revelation: The Birth of a New Age, San Francisco, Rainbow Bridge, 1976; Towards a Planetary Vision, Forres, Findhorn Publications, 1977; The New Age, Issaquah, The Morningtown Press, 1988; The Rebirth of the Sacred, London, Gateway Books, 1988.

To the above list I would like to add the following: Baba Ram Dass (born Richard Alpert, a Harvard University Professor of Psychology) who has written various popular books, which in the 1970s effectively launched the New Age, as we know it now, the United States: Be Here Now, Hanuman Foundation Santa Fe, NM (1971); The Only Dance There Is, Bantam Books, Doubleday Dell, New York, NY (1973); Grist for the Mill, Unity Press, Santa Cruz, CA (1977); Journey of the Awakening, Bantam Books, New York, NY (1978); Miracle of Love, Hanuman Foundation, Santa Fe, NM (1979). Helen Schucman wrote the New Age textbook: A Course in Miracles, Foundation for Inner Peace, CA (1976). Shirley MacLaine, with her books Out of a Limb (1984, also a movie) and Dancing in the Light (1986), is one of the most visible propagators of New Age beliefs. Other New Age writers are George Leonard, Jean Houston, Barbara Marx Hubbard, Norman Shealy, Sam Keen and Timothy Leary.

Famous writers of the first half of the 20th century had anticipated themes and sensibilities dear to New Age literature: Hermann Hesse's renowned Siddhartha (1919), Narcissus and Goldmund (1930), and Journey to the East (1932). Richard Bach, who is a student of Silva Mind Control,(89) with his hugely successful Jonathan Livingstone Seagull (1970), has interpreted the myth of mental evolution. I would consider hugely successful Brazilian novelist Paulo Coelho a New Age author of some sort, who has been instrumental in giving a literary and moral dignity to some main New Age ideas.(90) Among his books are: The Pilgrimage (1987), The Alchemist (1988), The Valkyries (1992), By the River Piedra I Sat Down and Wept (1994), Veronika Decides to Die (1998), Eleven Minutes (2003).

The Salem New Age Center (salemctr.com) gives a list of the top selling New Age books. A simple reading of the titles of the books gives a good idea of New Age's focus and interests. Interestingly, most of the authors are women. The titles are: Conversations With God; Cure For All Diseases; Love Is In The Earth; Cure For All Cancers; Seven Spiritual Laws of Success; The Only Astrology Book You'll Ever Need; Animal Energies; Awakening To Zero Point; Heal Your Body; Way Of The Wizard; Infinite Mind; Hands of Light; Sacred Space; Witches Almanac; Kryon Alchemy of The Human Spirit; You Can Heal Your Life; You Are Becoming A Galactic Human; Feng Shui: A Layman's Guide; Reiki: The Healing Touch; Complete Book of Oils and Aromatherapy; Psychic Healing With Spirit Guides and Angels; Celestine Prophecy: An Experiential Guide; Into A Timeless Realm; Relax: God Is In Charge; Wicca: A Guide For The Solitary Practitioner; All Women Are Healers; Way of the Peaceful Warrior; Many Lives, Many Masters; Open Your Mind to Prosperity; Embraced By The Light; Creative Visualization; The Complete Ascension Manual.

The same website also gives lists of top selling inspirational, health and healing, UFO, Wicca and New Paganism books.

 

2. New Age Music

New Age music was born some twenty years ago. It has quickly become immensely popular. It is one of the major tools of New Age propagation in contemporary society. There is no major music shop without a section devoted to New Age music.

New Age music derives elements from electronic music, "new acoustic" instrumental music, therapeutic music, selected sacred styles, Celtic music, and various other hybrids. New Age music is generally tranquil, dreamy, soft, evocative and somewhat spiritual and mysterious, intended for ambience and mood control. It is mainly bought by 'yuppies', young, successful single people.

There are a number of recognized artists who have also produced New Age-like music, among them: Brian Eno, Enigma, Paul Winter, Peter Gabriel and Secret Garden. Celtic New Age music has been particularly successful. It was born as a distinct genre with the 1988 solo debut of Irish singer Enya. Celtic New Age music is recognizable by its ethereal and haunting sounds from traditional Irish instruments. Clannad and Loreena McKennitt are also well-known artists of this genre.

In his performances David Arkenstone provides music of galactic voyages, while Yanni projects a sort of mystical sex appeal. Flutist R. Carlos Nakai creates relaxing music rooted in Native American culture, while George Winston works on compositions that are deeply poetic. Other New Age musicians are Philip Aaberg and Adiemus.

 

3. New Age movies and TV series

New Age concepts and practices are popular with famous pop and movie stars. Top stars often mention how good and negative energies affect their lives and careers. To neutralize the negativity and relieve the stress of being a mega-fame star, they secure guru guidance, practise meditation, delve in astrology, carry crystals and other energy and good fortune objects.

New Age has expanded especially in California, where many of its centres, leaders, sympathizers and supporters are located. As a consequence it has influenced not only the electronic-media industry, but also the world of entertainment. The movie industry, especially in Hollywood, has been producing an enormous quantity of movies based on themes connected with New Age beliefs although this is not always explicitly acknowledged. Movies that touch on the theme of reality and time in New Age fashion are, among others, Matrix, Waking Life, Sliding Doors, Back To The Future, Somewhere In Time, Frequency, and Groundhog Day. Favourite movies that feature experiences of visions are: The Never-ending Story, Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark, Splash, Mr. Peabody, The Muse, and The Mermaid. The subject of life after death such as in Sixth Sense, Ghost, Field of Dream, Meet Joe Black, and After Life is always popular. Also numerous are movies about extraterrestrial encounters and experiences: Independence Day, E.T., Close Encounters of The Third Kind, Contact, and Cocoon. The following movies play up enhanced abilities and sensibilities: Phenomenon, Stir of Echoes, Resurrection, Powder, The Shadow, Altered States and Brainstorm. Angels are the protagonists of City of Angels, Wings of Desire and Michael. Devil-related movies are produced in an increasing number.

Shirley MacLaine, probably the most famous current figure in the New Age movement, plays herself in Out of a Limb, the TV mini-series (1986) that describes her journey into New Age.

In 1994 Michael Tolkin directed a movie entitled The New Age, which describes the American New Age world somewhat critically and ironically.

New Age ideas and beliefs are ever more prominent in many TV programs, where the boundary between reality, fantasy, the fantastic, the magic and the paranormal is blurred. Among the most popular of these programs are Twin Peaks, Ally McBeal and The X Files.

In most television entertainment programmes in 'catholic' Italy, there is an astrologer who, with the seriousness of a scientist, reads horoscopes and tells fortunes. This is nothing new, certainly, but in the past astrology and magic were considered a somewhat decadent and reprehensible phenomenon, limited to a backward minority. Now it has been elevated to an all-time high dignity and popularity, involving the rich, the famous and the glamorous.

 
  
89. Silva Mind Control was founded in 1944 by a Mexican Catholic, who claimed to have received new revelations from Jesus. The method aimed at increasing consciousness to obtain psychological orientation in accordance with New Age thought. See Fuss, The New Age, pp. 11-12.

90. Ferdinando Castelli, L'Alchimista di Paulo Coelho cammina sui sentieri del New Age. La Civilta Cattolica, No. 1, 1997, pp. 227-238.
第二十四卷 (2003年) Bultmann's Demythologization and Lonergan's Method
by Stephen Tong S.J.(董泽龙)

Introduction



Though Bultmann and Lonergan belong to two different traditions, they share the common concern and effort of trying to accommodate the Christian faith to our modern world. Faithful to his Protestant tradition, Bultmann focuses on the distinctive role of Scripture and kergyma as the word of God. The influence and impact of the word of God on Christian life has unfortunately diminished since the Enlightenment. Baptized by the modern and scientific worldview, Christians nowadays generally find many scriptural messages nonsensical since supernatural intervention in daily life, which is so vivid in the Scriptures, has no longer any role or place in our scientific mindset. Bultmann laments that this kind of stumbling block covers and even suppresses the genuine meaning of the kerygma, which has nothing to do with looking for God's direct intervention in human life. Therefore, his project is to strip off the so-called mythological elements of the Scriptures so that the inherent challenge of God's word can once again confront its hearers.

Appropriating his Catholic tradition, Lonergan is concerned with the congealed understanding of faith and theology in terms of an exclusively classicist mindset and culture. If our world is moving towards the recognition and validation of pluralist cultures and religions, doing theology can no longer remain in the ghetto thinking that the only valid way is to start with self-evident premises, followed by logical deduction and settled in foreseeable conclusions. Otherwise, theology is destined to become irrelevant. Our scientific mindset starts with data and experience. From scattered and random data to attaining truth and value, everything is under the control of method. To develop a good method is to study and discover the inner operations of the subject. That is why Lonergan focuses his study on the transcendental structures of human consciousness. He strongly believes that only when rooted in this solid self-correcting method can a theologian mediate the Christian faith to various cultures and make it sensible to them.

The following pages comprise two parts. The first part is an attempt to study and present succinctly the rationality of Bultmann' project of demythologization and Lonergan's thought on method. Though their directions and categories are very different, their horizons merge in certain area. Thus, in the second part a comparison is presented in order to facilitate an understanding of their similarities and divergences. They both agree on the prior action of God's love or God's word, and the significance of the responsibility of the subject or the hearer of the word. Their disagreement finally dwells on their basic difference in epistemology.

The Meaning and Purpose of Demythologization

1. The Horizon of Eschatology

The starting point and basic assertion of Bultmann's project of demythologization is that "Today nobody doubts that Jesus' conception of the Kingdom of God is an eschatological one,"(1) which is the heart of Jesus' preaching and message. There are two things at stake in this statement, namely, the kingdom of God and eschatology. While the former is a category of space, the latter is one of time. The kingdom of God seems to be an emphasis on the transcendent realm that is in contrast and actually in conflict with the human world, agenda and construct. In this sense, God and God's will are always the Absolute Other that is beyond human reason and grasp. Bultmann once exhorted the assembly in his homily, "Has our old picture of him fallen to pieces? If so, then we must first of all be grateful that we have lost our false conception;... New sides of his infinity constantly emerge, strange and enigmatic;... never static and at rest, but constantly ready to yield anew, to allow itself to be raised anew."(2) This conception of the kingdom of God, logically, renders any present understanding of God inadequate and surpassable. Therefore, no present should simply be an attachment to or a repetition of the past, but should always be opened to the future. This is the rationality for the other side of the same coin, namely, eschatology. Eschatology means the doctrine of the last things, implying the dimension of the future for the sake of shedding light on the present. If the Greek perceives the present as decided and emptied by the future and final destiny, Jesus and the New Testament writers see the present in the light of the final judgment of God at the end of time. If the Greek's vision implies humility and fatalistic submission, Jesus demands of human beings first and foremost responsibility toward God and repentance.(3)

Furthermore, borrowing the insight of St. John, whose Gospel shifts the cosmological eschatology to an historical eschatology, Bultmann affirms the "once-for-all" of eschatology while he denies the legitimacy of other once-for-all statements about God. There is a paradox here. The once-for-all eschatological Christ event affirms that the only genuine encounter with God happens in concrete history and time, rather than in any so-called timeless statements of truth. So, if I follow Christ, I am to let this eschatological moment, as the only timeless truth, reveal itself in me here and now through the kergyma and demand my personal response.(4)

2. The Notion of Freedom

Related to his eschatology, Bultmann situates freedom proper as the bliss after death when Christians have an untroubled relationship with God, which has been mythologically but properly described as a worshipping community that sings hymns of praise and thanksgiving. This kind of freedom, however, is different from the platonic mythological picture of dialogue in the transcendent realm, and from its conception of freedom that the spirit is finally liberated from the body and is satisfied with perceiving the truth. Christian freedom is freedom from sin and the old self, the yeast that is incompatible with the God's holiness. The difference between these two understandings is due to distinct conceptions of human nature. For Bultmann, the Greek conceives human nature as not subject to time or history, while the biblical conception of the human being is essentially temporal and historical. The former understanding directs human ideal living towards static and quiet contemplation, while the latter perceives the ideal Christian life as ongoing towards a future of the totally new. However, this newness is not visible because it is hidden with Christ in God. "It does not yet appear what we shall be." (1Jn 3:2) (5) This tension renders faith, hope and love dominant dispositions for Christians to cultivate by the grace of God.

Dialectically, this eschatological freedom has been achieved once and for all in the Christ event, which is always present in the proclaimed word, not as timeless truth, but as happening here and now. In this sense, the eschatological freedom justifies and demands the existential freedom to take up responsibility here and now. This inner logic grounds the rationality of demythologization, in line with the Protestant doctrine of justification by faith. If this doctrine frees Luther from the works of law, it frees Bultmann from the sphere of knowledge and thought through the project of demythologization. Both of them aim to emancipate people from deceived and enslaving security. For Luther, it was the security of good works. For Bultmann, it was the security built on objectifying knowledge, which renders to Christians the illusion that they have got hold of God and thus become blind and deaf to God's word spoken here and now and calling for their action and response. In this sense, established security through reason renders Christians not blessed or free for God as the eschatological vision shows.(6)

3. Demythologization Proper

Bultmann understands demythologization as a hermeneutical method to discover the meaning of the Scriptures. This method dwells within a dialectical tension. Negatively, it is an abandonment of the biblical worldview that has become a stumbling block for understanding God's word for us. "To de-mythologize is to deny that the message of Scripture and of the Church is bound to an ancient world-view which is obsolete." (7) In fact, our modern world is shaped by science, to which a mythological cosmos makes no sense. A modern person does not look for transcendent intervention or miracles, as those in the biblical worldview did, to explain daily events or solve their related problems, whether they might be physical sickness, family finance or national security. If the scriptural message still sticks with non-sensible mythological expressions, its actual and important meaning as God's word to us here and now becomes elusive, if not totally inaccessible. For Bultmann, the essence of the scriptures is "kergyma, that is, a proclamation addressed not to the theoretical reason, but to the hearer as a self." (8) The perennial message of God's word is to challenge the hearer, shaped by whatever worldview, it might be, to give up personal sinfulness and security, and become a new person in Christ. This understanding of giving up is structurally correlated with Bultmann's eschatology and notion of freedom. Bultmann is fully aware that this kind of giving up and option for freedom is a stumbling block for the hearer, as Paul has already acknowledged. If this is a genuine stumbling block inherent in the kergyma, however, the mythological worldview as a stumbling block for our modern Christians is a false one. In order to render the hearers capable of focussing on and being challenged by the genuine one, the mythological worldview has to be removed by demythologization. Here, Bultmann has no intention at all of incorporating the modern worldview into the kergyma, since any worldview for Bultmann, in spite of its usefulness, is simply a human construct or reasoning that shapes and promises illusive security, and falls short of putting our total trust in God.

Positively, demythologization is equipped and engaged by the categories of existential philosophy to sharpen the exigency of the kergyma. Taking demythologization as a hermeneutic method, Bultmann is aware that interpretation is always based on principles and conceptions as its presuppositions since God's word has to be mediated through human language shaped by certain philosophical categories. But two things are at stake. First, if presuppositions cannot be removed from the beginning of interpretation, nevertheless they should not determine or foresee its outcome in advance. "An exegesis which, for example, makes the presupposition that its results must agree with some dogmatic statement is not a real and fair exegesis."(9) This statement is certainly consistent with Bultmann's suspicion towards any human construct or worldview that aims to explain everything in certain logical and foreseeable ways. Second, which are the adequate presuppositions? This question is related to that of the philosophy one should adopt. Certainly, this adoption is not arbitrary, but should contribute to the understanding of the kergyma, which demands an existential response to God's word in freedom from sin and freedom for love. In this sense, Bultmann sees the value of existential philosophy whose categories are not supposed to replace God's word, but can enhance the sensibility and exigency of the hearer towards it. This kind of dynamic is similar to that by which understanding a musical text presupposes one's being musical, or understanding a book on mathematics presupposes one's ability to think mathematically. Unless a person intends to live an authentic life, the essence of God's word does not make sense to him or her. When we Christians encounters a scriptural text, our main interest or purpose is not so much to receive historical or political information as to let it say something to our actual present existence so that we can hear the truth about our life and our soul. Existential philosophy exactly demands the truthfulness of existence too. Its own logic forbids itself to tell anyone how to exist, but affirms that one must exist. While its categories give no answer to the question of our personal existence, they sharpen our awareness of the need to take up personal responsibility and make us open to the word of God. In this sense, Bultmann rejects the criticism that demythologization turns Christian faith into philosophy. An existential analysis of love does not lead a person to understand how he must love here and now, apart from making clear to him the timeless truth that only by loving can one understand love. The response and power to love in a concrete here and now finally depends on the encounter with God's word. Bultmann delineates sharply the difference between faith and theology. While faith is entirely an existential event, theology is a disciplined interpretation of faith, utilizing existentialist categories as tools of thought. It is not too reckless to say that theology is simply a handmaid of faith.

Furthermore, Bultmann's existential concern does not allow any possibility of valid investigation of God's self "because we cannot speak of what God is in Himself but only of what He is doing to us and with us."(10) However, he tries to dispel the fear and accusation of being entirely subjective in demythologization. No doubt, demythologization partly depends on personal experience, perception, and decision, but its objective basis is God's word in the Scriptures. A person cannot discover his human-God relationship by looking into himself; it can only be made real by his encounter with the demythologized word of God.(11)

4. The Understanding of God As Acting

Demythologization is to affirm that God is acting in the world. However, this action does not happen among worldly actions or events; it rather happens within them. The recognition of this reality can only appeal to the eyes of faith, not to the evidence of any causal relationship between events.

Bultmann makes it clear that demythologization does not exempt one from using symbolic language or images, since he acknowledges that "Mythological conceptions can be used as symbols or images which are perhaps necessary to the language of religion and therefore also of the Christian faith."(12) However, he denies the valid use of these symbols and images in a general sense. For example, images such as God as creator or God as acting do not refer to any event without myself being involved in this event. The analogical use of the symbolic language must correlate with a personal or an existential reference. "When we speak in this manner of God as acting, we conceive [of] God's action as an analogue to the actions taking place between men...It is in this analogical sense that we speak of God's love and care for men...and it is in this analogical sense that we call Him Father."(13) Here, Bultmann denies the legitimacy of affirming God as the creator of the world or Jesus as the saviour of the world, apart from my relationship with God as creature and with Jesus as my saviour. The strength of faith is to accept that the former statements in general cannot be proved so that faith transcends the causal relationship that can be proved in this world and thus stands in a privileged position with regard to theoretical reason, without succumbing to the latter's logic and demand.


















  
















1. Rudolf Bultmann, Jesus Christ and Mythology (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1958), 13.

2. Rudolf Bultmann, Existence and Faith: Shorter Writings of Rudolf Bultmann, tr. by Schubert Ogden (New York: Meridan, 1960). This passage is Used by Roger A. Roman, Rudolf Bultmann: Interpreting Faith for the Modern Era (London: Collins, 1987), 48.

3. Jesus Christ and Mythology, 26.

4. Cf. Ibid, 81-82.

5. Cf. ibid, 28-31.

6. Cf. ibid, 82-84.

7. Ibid, 36.

8. Ibid, 36.

9. Ibid, 49.

10. Ibid, 73.

11. Cf. ibid 49-59.

12. Ibid, 67.

13.Ibid, 68-69.

A Presentation of Lonergan's Method Related to Interpretation

1. Cognitive Theory

Lonergan's theology is a theology of the subject. The study of the subject's operation towards truth and value is Lonergan's lifelong project. He sees that an existential subject is a subject by degrees. It discerns different levels of consciousness. In a dreaming state, we are only potential subjects without freedom to think or act. However, we become experiential subjects able to perceive and feel about the sensible world when we are awake. When we follow our desire for intelligibility and go on to inquire about our experience, to understand its possible meanings and implications, we arise to be an intelligent subject. Then the rational subject sublates the experiential and rational when it desires to check if its understanding is correct, marshals the evidence pro and con and finally judges it to be or not to be. Finally, the responsible consciousness sublates the rational one when the former follows the intention of the good, the question of value to deliberate, decide and act on what is truly worthwhile. Therefore, there are four operations in our consciousness, which Lonergan subsumes in four transcendental precepts, namely, be attentive in experience, be intelligent in understanding, be reasonable in judging and be responsible in deliberation.(14) "Transcendental" has two meanings here. First, obedience to the four transcendental precepts is not an automatic process but one that is achieved by the subject's engaging in the process of self-transcendence. Second, every genuine knowing and acting, without exception, has to go through these operations in our consciousness. The self-appropriation of these transcendental precepts is what Lonergan means by method, whereby one approaches truth and value.

In his cognitive theory Lonergan affirms first that knowing is a compound of many operations, not a single uniform property. Objectivity in experiencing the immediate world is attained by sensing and intuition, yet it is not the only level of knowing. In the mediated world of meaning, objectivity is approached by questioning, which governs the exigencies of human intelligence to investigate and understand, and of human reasonableness to judge the virtually unconditioned. What is grasped in understanding or judging is not some further datum added on to the data of sense. In fact, it is unlike all data but consists in an intelligible or reasonable unity. Second, apart from being a thinker, the subject is also a doer who deliberates, chooses and acts as a free and responsible agent for making of the self. If knowing is for the sake of being, acting is for the sake of value. Value here not only refers to a particular good but also to ordering goods for the sake of the truly good. Being and value are both transcendental notions, i.e., their entirety is beyond the reach of the subject, yet always present in its activity of knowing and acting. They guide the person towards their greater fullness. Just as we can only have limited knowledge of being by knowing this and that and other beings, the actualization of value can only be found in this or that act of a good person.(15) Therefore, what is finally at stake is the subject who, by the effect of self-transcendence, attains objectivity in knowing and becomes the principle of goodness in decision and action.

Cognitive theory affirms that human knowing is a dynamic structure. Instead of just being a single part -- sensing, or understanding, or judging -- knowing consists of their combination as a dynamic structure, an immanent moving from one part to another for the whole. Moreover, these parts function differently, so they cannot be understood in an analogous sense. If knowing is like this, so knowing what knowing is follows the same structure. First, it is the experience of one's experience, understanding and judgment on our different levels of consciousness whenever we perform them. Second, through insight comes understanding the experience of these levels as an inevitable elevator if we want to know. Finally, by exigency comes judgment asking whether this understanding of human knowing is true. In order to doubt or reject this understanding, however, the knower has to go through the foregoing process of cognitive structure again, i.e., the denial is self-referentially inconsistent. So the judgment has to be true.

Lonergan succeeds in affirming the irrevocable structure of human knowing. This irrevocable structure of human knowing is important because, first, objectivity is thus granted on three different levels, namely experiential, normative and absolute, corresponding to the three components in the cognitive structure. Second, it refutes the mistaken notion of knowing as seeing, which cannot help but lead to naive realism or idealism. The former affirms reality by generalizing the simple experience of seeing, a naive affirmation often without genuine understanding, while the latter denies knowing reality at all. Third, it provides a critical analysis to situate our knowing on the level of being, namely, reality again, so that the Kantian wound between phenomenon and noumenon is healed. Fourth, it provides the basis for taking human knowing as a continuous and progressive enterprise, overcoming the classic or static approach. Finally, it provides also the justification for functional specialties in a complementary and dynamic whole for method in theology.

2. The Realms of Meaning and Differentiation of Consciousness

If cognitive theory discusses the operation of the human mind and heart, then realms of meaning represent how our mind and heart structure reality. Transcending the animals' life that is merely submerged into the world of immediacy, the human world is basically mediated by meaning. Meaning orients individuals, organizes groups and communities, and forms cultures. Corresponding to his differentiation of human consciousness, Lonergan names the realms of meaning as common sense, theory, interiority and transcendence, and to these four he later adds scholarship and art. This differentiation is another dimension of his anthropology, in addition to cognitive theory.

Common sense deals with persons and things that are related to us. It represents the visible universe that we encounter. By transcendental precepts we reach insight, judgment and decision to meet the exigency of the situation in an appropriate way. Theory, bracketing the usefulness and practicality of things to us, provides the systematic and explanatory view of things in their mutual relationships. Theory develops terms, definitions, formulas, and constructs models with special kinds of technical language, laws and universal principles. Interiority emerges by adverting to and heightening our conscious operations and the dynamic structure that relates them to one another. That is how the transcendental precepts are discovered. Transcendence absorbs the compartmentalized world of meaning into a silent and all-embracing self-surrender to God's love. Scholarship is the realm of language, exegesis, literature and history. By using the subject's common sense language, it aims at understanding the meanings of the words and deeds of other people in different places or times. Its interest is not in a universal explanation, but in the intentions inherent in particular events. Finally, art is the realm of beauty in expressing ideas into objects or movements by commanding form???.(16)

Culture is informed by meaning. Different realms of meaning represent the variety and fecundity of cultures. This analysis is a phenomenological rebuttal of the classic and single notion of culture. If theology is to fulfil its task of mediating between the matrix of cultures and the role of religion within that matrix, the theologian is required to be capable of dexterously shifting from one realm of meaning to another in his studying or communicating the religious message for different readers or audiences. But what is the condition of the possibility of accomplishing this task? It lies in going back to the transcendental precepts, namely being attentive, intelligent, reasonable and responsible.

3. The Notion of Conversion

Conversion is the about-face of one's horizon by renouncing the core characteristics in the old one, leading the subject into a greater depth and breadth in truth and value. There is a hermeneutic circle between transcendental precepts and conversion. It is by the grace and event of conversion that the subject becomes self-transcendent in attentiveness to experience, in the intelligence to reach insight and understanding, in the reasonableness to seek out the virtually unconditioned, and in the responsibility to make a decision. On the other hand, it is the cumulative operations of the transcendental precepts which engender the possibility of conversion.

There are three kinds of conversion, namely, religious, moral, and intellectual conversion. Religious conversion represents a person totally falling in love with God, a recognition or initiation of ultimate concern in one's life. It is a recognition or initiation because any intentionality flows from the eros of the human spirit. As Aristotle says, everyone desires to know. Also, Augustine sighs deeply that his heart is restless unless it rests in God. This eros rooted in us initiates and is prior to all human enterprises, knowing and acting, but we may perhaps not recognize it. We search for the intelligibility of the cosmos but are oblivious to its intelligible ground. In fact, any question about human beings is finally a question about God. When this love is recognized, it signifies a surrender and faith without limits or qualifications, without conditions or reservations. This love is not simply an act but rather a state of self-surrender, from which other acts flow. It gives us a new horizon that transvalues and transforms because it surpasses the old one where originating value is only human beings and terminal value is the good that human beings bring about. Now, the originating value is the divine light and love, while the terminal value is the whole universe. As a result, human concern reaches beyond the human world to God and God's world; and human development is not only in skills and virtues but also in holiness.(17)

On the one hand, this self-transcendence into God's domain represents reaching the utmost outpost. On the other hand, human self-transcendence is ever precarious. In our dialectical advancement we tend to lose balance and downgrade the reality of God. For example, we may overemphasize God's transcendence but neglect God's immanence so that God becomes remote and irrelevant. On the contrary, God's immanence may be so overemphasized and transcendence neglected that the religious symbol becomes idol, ritual becomes magic, and recital a myth, etc. Meanwhile, in religious conversion faith has to discern the value of believing the word of religion, of accepting the judgments of fact and the judgments of value that the religion proposes, because faith is not an isolated or individual affair but has roots in a religious community. This community inherits the tradition initiated by the divine entry of God into human history and calls for a response. This call is expressed in various forms, including imperative ones, such as the command of love of God and neighbour. It might be expressed in narrative, such as the story of the community's origin and development; or in the ascetical, such as the teaching of spirituality; or in theory, such as the teaching of wisdom, the goodness of God and the manifestation of God's intentions. The genuineness of all these expressions has to be under scrutiny.(18) While this kind of discernment in faith constitutes the whole of theology, it should simultaneously enhance the possibility of self-transcendence for the sake of deeper conversion, avoid pitfalls or downgrade God's reality. Here comes a point of methodology, of the "how" which keeps our balance in check.

Moral conversion involves the change of the criteria of one's decision and choices from mere satisfaction to values, opting for the truly good, to a point even against satisfaction if it conflicts with the value to be upheld. It is a time for one to exercise vertical freedom and to set up, or radically change, one's basic horizon. The drive to value rewards success in self-transcendence with a happy conscience and saddens failures with an unhappy one. Here, moral conversion presupposes the judgments of value that differ in content but not in structure from judgment of fact. They differ in content because what is judged to be real need not be approved. However, they share the same criterion, namely, the self-transcendence of the subject to reach what is independent of the subject. In fact, judgments of value are felt to be true or false in so far as they generate a peaceful or uneasy conscience. Of course, the purpose of judgments of value is not merely knowing but also doing. Sin lies in the very dichotomy between knowing and doing, i.e. one does not follow what one affirms to be truly good. Moral conversion implies a decision and choice to make knowing and doing congruent and consistent. Furthermore, judgments of value should occur in a context of growth, i.e., one advances the judgments from agreeable to vital, from vital to social, from social to cultural, from cultural to personal, and from personal to religious value, to being in love with God. In this sense, moral conversion aims unceasingly at following this Ordo Amoris to higher values, until one's love of God is complete. At this point values are whatever one loves, and evils are whatever one hates. At this stage one becomes a self-transcendent person or, in an Aristotelian sense, a virtuous one who represents the incarnated principle of benevolence and true loving. However, as mentioned above, conversion is not an automatically ever-advancing process. Deviation from the order and relapse often occur because of neurotic needs and attachments. Therefore, a normative pattern of recurrent and related operations is revealed to check our deviation.(19)

Intellectual conversion is "a radical clarification and, consequently, the elimination of an exceedingly stubborn and misleading myth concerning reality, objectivity, and human knowledge."(20) Lonergan illustrates the dialectic opposition between naive realism, empiricism, idealism and critical realism as an example of intellectual conversion. He contends strongly that it is necessary to distinguish the world of immediacy, which is reached by our senses, and the world mediated by meaning, which is reached by our consciousness or insight. Knowing the latter is not some kind of inner looking or sensing, as the naive realists believe, as if there were some inner images that we could see or touch. In fact, knowing is achieved by a structure of operations, namely experiencing, understanding, judging and deciding. The reality known is not just looked at; it is given in experience, organized and explained by understanding, posited by judgment and belief. Therefore, knowledge is not restricted to sense experience, as it is by the empiricist, who takes understanding, judging and believing as merely subjective activities, Nor is it as envisaged by the idealist who, includes understanding and sensing as knowing, yet thinks of the world mediated by meaning as not real but ideal. Only the critical realist acknowledges the facts of human knowing and insists that the world mediated by meaning is the real world. This demonstration sets up a paradigm to engender intellectual conversion and rebut intellectual myth. Objectivity in the world of meaning has its appeal to us. It is not reached just by our sensing or by a mental construct, but by a self-transcendent subject who is willing to go through the transcendental structure of operations inherent in our consciousness.

These three conversions occur in a single consciousness and one sublates the other. Sublation means that what sublates goes beyond what is sublated, bringing something new and distinct on a new basis, yet keeping the sublated intact, preserving all its characteristics and carrying them to a fuller realization within a richer context. In this sense, moral conversion sublates the intellectual because it sets the subject on a new, existential level of consciousness and establishes the person as an originating value. At the same time, it does anything but weaken the subject's devotion to truth. In fact, it needs the truth in accord with the exigency of the rational consciousness before the subject can deliberately respond to value. On the other hand, the search for truth now has a richer context and stimulation for the pursuit of all values.

Similarly, religious conversion sublates moral conversion because the subject finds its capacity and desire for self transcendence in fulfilment and joy in this other-worldly love, which provides a new basis for all values and doing good. The originating value goes beyond the human being and takes root in God, the ground of all intelligibility and commitment. This new basis in no way negates or diminishes the fruits attained by moral or intellectual conversion. On the contrary, now all human pursuit of truth and good is placed within a cosmic context and purpose, and this love even grants to the subject the power of accepting the inevitable suffering required to undo the effects of decline due to human inauthenticity towards truth and goodness.(21)

From a causal point of view, however, it is religious conversion, God's gift of divine love, which appears first so that the taste of this love reveals values in their splendour to the subject. The subject, in returning love out of a deep sense of gratitude, is then determined to give up the wrong doings and mere satisfaction of the old horizon, in order to do the genuine good and follow all the commandments which are rooted in this totally Other. Next, this deliberation, or moral conversion, leads the subject to discern the truths taught by the religious tradition, and in such a tradition and belief lie the seeds of intellectual conversion.(22)


















  
















14. Cf. Bernard Lonergan, "The Subject", A Second Collection: Papers by Bernard J.F. Lonergan, S.J., ed. By William F. J. Ryan, S.J. and Bernard J. Tyrell, S.J. (London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1974), 79-81.

15. According to Aristotle, "Virtue...is a state of character concerned with choice, lying in a mean, i.e. the mean relative to us, this being determined by a rational principle, and by that principle by which a man of practical wisdom would determine it." (Nicomachean Ethics, II, vi, 15; 1106b 36ff) There is, therefore, no definition of virtue without its embodiment in a virtuous person. This whole thrust leads Lonergan to situate personal conversion as the foundation of doing theology.

16. Cf. Bernard Lonergan, Method In Theology (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1971), 83-84, 273-274

17. Cf. Ibid, 116, 240.

18. Cf. Ibid, 110-111, 118. This attention originates from and corresponds to Ignatius' caution on the afterglow of consolation. The origin from God might not be doubted, but the thinking and acting after it should be checked by the transcendental precepts.

19. Cf. Ibid, 35-39, 240.

20. Cf. Ibid, 238.

21. Cf. Ibid, 242.

22. Cf. Ibid, 243.

A Comparison of Demythologization and Method

The thrust of demythologization dwells on the exigency of being responsible to the challenge of God's word here and now by freeing oneself from attachment to the achieved yet illusive security in certain established worldviews, in the light of the eschatological judgment of God. This kind of operation seems to fit into the fourth level of consciousness in Lonergan's framework, where the subject experiences the love of God flooding his heart by the Holy Spirit and then taking this love as the originating value to decide and be responsible towards one's life. It is a dynamic from religious conversion heading towards moral conversion for higher values and the truly good. Lonergan would agree that this operation does not rely on the attained knowledge in one's worldview. Though the dictum goes that there is no love without prior knowing, Lonergan argues that in religious matters love precedes knowledge and the very beginning of faith is due to God's grace. This love is the cause that leads human beings to seek knowledge of God.(23) Bultmann has a similar understanding: "Man has a knowledge of God in advance, though not of the revelation of God, that is, of His action in Christ. He has a relation to God in his search for God, conscious or unconscious ... The question of God and the question of myself are identical."(24) In line with Pascal's famous insight, the heart has its reasons that reason itself does not understand, Lonergan sees that the heart's reasons are the discernment of, and intentional responses to, values as knowledge attained by faith, distinctive from the factual knowledge achieved by experiencing, understanding, and judging.

If this is granted, Bultmann is certainly right that whatever the outdated mythological knowledge or the prevailing scientific knowledge may be, it has little or even nothing to do with one's encounter with God in faith. Concerning the conditions of the possibility of one's conversion towards higher values or responsible action for God, Lonergan emphasizes the prior love of God, while Bultmann focuses on the power of God's word, its eschatological vision and its inherent judgment. Lonergan seems not to confine the flooding of God's love in our heart to reading the Scriptures or listening to the kergyma only, though they are certainly its privileged mediation. The Holy Spirit, however, is free to grant a similar consolation without previous cause. "Of itself, then, in as much as it is conscious without being known, the gift of God's love is an experience of the holy, of Rudolf Otto's myterium fascinans et tremendum. It is what Paul Tillich named a being grasped by ultimate concern. It corresponds to St. Ignatius Loyola's consolation that has no cause, as expounded by Karl Rahner."(25)

About the problem of myth, Lonergan distinguishes the different functions of meaning, namely, cognitive, efficient, constitutive, and communicative.(26) Lacking distinctions, primitive consciousness blends cognitive meaning insensibly with the constitutive, and the result is myth. The distinction between mere words, the meaning of the words, and the realities meant by the words is a later achievement of the mind. Demythologization seems to represent an effort to recover the cognitive meaning by discarding the constitutive one. The constitutive vision of the end of the world at hand must give way to the eschatological exigency of the present. But the question is: is the eschatological exigency the only cognitive meaning in the Scriptures? Lonergan seems to prefer the polymorphism of human consciousness that can raise different sets of questions towards various actual cognitive meanings. Let us take an example: God is vengeful. In a not-yet differentiated consciousness towards some deep religious experience, a primitive mind stuck in naive realism would definitely perceive God as somebody-already-out-there who does not tolerate injustice and evil deeds. Bultmann would definitely see this proposition as myth and would likely discard the constitutive meaning of an angry God and emphasize the myth's cognitive meaning of a call to abandon sinfulness here and now as our responsibility before God. However, a psychiatrist seems to see something more:

In fact, clinical evidence suggests that atrophy of the religious sense in man results in a distortion of his religious concepts. Or, to put it in a less clinical vein, once the angel in us is repressed, he turns into a demon... for time and again we watch and witness how repressed religion degenerates into superstition. In our century, a deified reason and a megalomanic technology are the repressive structures to which the religious feeling is sacrificed...Soon the only thing that would be left of all his science would be the atom bombs he possessed.

.... In concluding this chapter we might venture to say that God is a 'vengeful God' indeed, for neurotic existence in some cases seem to be the toll that a crippled relation to transcendence takes on man.(27)

From this passage, we can almost see the ontological import of 'God is vengeful' that reacts to the suppressed transcendent dimension that the human being is supposed to be.

As a whole, Bultmann's horizon does not allow the legitimacy of making propositional statements about God or belief. This has much to do with the problem of objectifying conceptuality. Rooted in Neo-Kantianism, Bultmann understands the word 'objectify' as designating the object-making activity of reason. When he uses it, it does not refer to thinking that is oriented towards what is genuinely objective, but to a mental construct that provides a model for external reality. In this sense, Bultmann's thinking is in line with the Kantian distinction of phenomenon and noumenon. What we can know is only the phenomenon, constituted or structured by human reason and categories. The reality remains unknown. In light of this, theology should not pretend to know God or use the objectifying mode of thought. God is not our mental construct, but the 'wholly other' than us. "To speak of God in concepts appropriate to a mere construct of Reason is to make God into an idol."(28)

Therefore, it is Bultmann's epistemology that prevents him from making any general statements about God or belief. This paper cannot make a detailed study, discussion, and critique of the Kantian problematic, but a few points can be made to shed light to the contrast between Bultmann and Lonergan. First, Lonergan does not see knowledge as simply immanent to the subject or as the construct of reason by the subject, though it is attained through the subject's reason. In fact, genuine knowing is a self-transcendent process. In experiencing, the sense data is given to the self that is different from illusion. The subject needs to be attentive. In understanding, the mind raises questions that might be different from the established answers and then forms certain ideas or insights. The subject is to be intelligent. In judging, evidence needs to be marshalled so that the conditions can be fulfilled. The subject is to be reasonable. In this sense, objectivity is reached by authentic subjectivity that goes through the transcendental precepts. Second, there might be a certain confusion about what judgment is. It seems that we need to know all the conditions about the world or God, before we can make a judgment about either. Since it is impossible to know all the inter-related conditions, we cannot then make a judgment. But Lonergan distinguishes two kinds of questions. There are questions for intelligence which ask what, why and how. There are questions for reflection, which ask whether the former answers are correct. The limited commitment of judgment to answer 'is it so?' is different from the ongoing understanding of comprehensive coherence. The latter is the ideal of human intelligence. Judgment is to the effect that no matter what the later understanding of the universe might be, at least this is so. Is God vengeful? If the meaning is about an angry God already out there to punish our wrongdoings, the conditions are not fulfilled. If it means that the violation of our transcendent constitution finally makes us suffer, the judgment is right.

Third, the distinctive fourth level of consciousness in terms of decision and value is not isolated from or in conflict with the other three levels in terms of knowledge. In fact, as Aristotle says, "everyone desires to know." Part of the intentionality of feeling towards values is exactly knowledge itself. Lonergan understands their relationship as sublation. The higher levels of consciousness sublate the lower. In this sense, knowing God has no inherent or a priori conflict with commitment to and responsibility to God. Lonergan surely acknowledges Bultmann's concern about the danger of knowledge as becoming one's attachment to security. The problem is also similar to what the hermeneutic of suspicion uncovers, the so-called orthodoxy as the mask of ideology for self- interest. Lonergan describes it in vivid metaphors:

Such devaluation, distortion, corruption may occur only in scattered individuals. But it may occur on a more massive scale, and then the words are repeated, but the meaning is gone. The chair was still the chair of Moses, but it was occupied by the scribes and Pharisees. The theology was still scholastic, but the scholasticism was decadent. The religious order still read out the rules, but one wonders whether the home fires were still burning...(29)

Lonergan sees the problem as the loss of common meaning due to personal and collective inattention, or failure to understand, or undetected rationalization. The attachment to security or self-interest is as great as the problem of inauthentic knowing. In this sense, conversion is to be threefold, not simply religious, moral, or intellectual, but all three are necessary.

Finally, an existential exigency in terms of decision and responsibility alone is incomplete and often neglects the objective hierarchy of values and the place where the truth lies. Existential commitment can be without a moral face. The incident of Heidegger's life-long and controversial connection with Nazism shows the limitation of his existential philosophy. Certainly, this limitation was already there in his description of Dasein. But the right description does not justify his wrongly actualized philosophical commitment. Applying the existential categories to theology, we still need to be attentive, intelligent, and reasonable to do moral and intellectual discernment for understanding God's will here and now for me as well as for others.


















  
















23. Cf. Ibid, 123, 283.

24. Jesus Christ and Mythology, 52-53.

25. Method, 106.

26. Cf. Ibid, 76-81 see their elaboration.

27. Victor E. Frankl, Man's Search For Ultimate Meaning (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Perseus Publishing, 1975), 75-76.

28. R.A. Johnson, Rudolf Bultmann, 25.

29. Method, 80.

Conclusion

The contribution of Bultmann's demythologization is to recover and emphasize the cognitive meaning of eschatology and the kingdom of God as the entry point of interpreting the kergyma, transcending the stumbling block of mythological language. It confronts Christian authenticity to have faith in God though living in a mundane world that is short of any horizon of the transcendent. In fact, this reality of secularization is actually the best accommodation for sharpening and fostering the genuineness of faith. For Bultmann, any human construct seemingly facilitating the justification and persuasiveness of faith exactly contradicts the essence of faith. A person of faith has no other support or reliance than God, not even his own intelligence or reason. What dignity of faith and what a noble mission we Christians are called to! We cannot but admire Bultmann's conviction of God's presence in the world without seeing God's trajectory. His scholarly work has no doubt encouraged many to reach up to the splendour of faith.

On the other hand, we acknowledge, from Lonergan's point of view, the limitation of Bultmann's perspective of the Scriptures that focuses only on the cognitive meanings of eschatology and the kingdom of God. The polymorphism of human consciousness and the momentum of human eros, in fact, not only envisage the exigency of human freedom and responsibility here and now, but also raise questions about understanding different dimensions of reality, whether they are social, political, historical, psychological, etc., and marshals evidence in order to make judgments on them. Lonergan sees no conflict between these operations as Bultmann does. Many differences between the two figures can be boiled down to their basic epistemological stands. While Bultmann sees the objectifying process of reason simply as a human mental construct, which falls short of reaching reality as such, Lonergan believes that the transcendental precepts lead the subject to attain truth and value in an ongoing process.

Finally, both Bultmann and Lonergan remind us of possible pitfalls. If in philosophical terms Heidegger understands this pitfall as our forgetfulness of Being, in theological categories Bultmann sees our problem as hanging on to good works in terms of technological and rational achievements, losing sight of forfeiting the established security and instead placing total trust in God here and now. In a similar way, Lonergan understands our progress and authenticity as always precarious due to our refusal to engage with the transcendental precepts. Consequently, truth is ignored and lower values prevail. From different perspectives and using different categories, both of them see the same significance of the authenticity of the subject that can no longer simply be attached to the past. There is no "second hand" faith. Each one has to actualize his or her self-appropriation of faith before God and for God by being attentive, being intelligent, being reasonable, and finally being responsible.

Bibliography

1. Bultmann, Rudolf. Jesus Christ and Mythology. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1958.

2. New Testament And Mythology and Other Basic Writings. Edited and translated by Schubert M. Ogden. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1984.

3. Existence and Faith: Shorter Writings of Rudolf Bultmann. Translated by Schubert Ogden. New York: Meridan, 1960.

4. Johnson, Roger A. Rudolf Bultmann: Interpreting Faith for the Modern Era. London: Collins Liturgical Publications, 1987.

5. The Origins of Demythologizing: Philosophy And Historiography In The Theology of Rudolf Bultmann. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1974.

6. Lonergan, Bernard. Collected Works Of Bernard Lonergan, Vol. 3: The Insight. Edited by Frederick E. Crowe & Robert M. Doran. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1992.

7. Method In Theology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 1996

8. "The Subject", A Second Collection: Papers by Bernard J.F. Lonergan, S.J. Edited by William F. J. Ryan, S.J. and Bernard J. Tyrell, S.J. London: Darton, Longman & Todd, 1974.